Test Results Matching your Search
Click here to start another test report search.
There are 44 documents that match your query. These 44 documents contain a total of 488 individual tests. The documents are listed below. You can click the title of the report to bring up a PDF version of the report in a new browser window. You will need Adobe Acrobat Reader to view the documents.
Executive Summary for Document Search
This search included results from:
- 14 locations
- 1 industry
- 3 different fuel types
- 14 different engine manufacturers
- 52 different engine types
- 11 different test procedures
The aggregate results for the tests in this search criteria show:
- 49 Specific Fuel Consumption tests were performed with an average improvement of 4.457%
- 112 Carbon Mass Balance tests were performed with an average improvement of 6.958%
- 9 Statistical tests were performed with an average improvement of 8.419%
- 90 Smoke Spot tests were performed with an average improvement of 20.502%
- 2 NOx tests were performed with an average improvement of 8.865%
- 66 CO tests were performed with an average improvement of 15.001%
- 59 HC tests were performed with an average improvement of 20.681%
- 65 CO2 tests were performed with an average improvement of 8.082%
- 8 Wear Metals tests were performed with an average improvement of 32.988%
- 19 Oil Consumption tests were performed with an average improvement of 32.389%
- 9 Withdrawal tests were performed with an average improvement of -6.067%
Result 11 of 44
Test Id: | 211 |
---|---|
Title: | Echo Bay Mining |
File Size: | 22.349 MB |
Industries: | Mining |
Report Type: | Field Test |
Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 23-Nov-1994 |
Test Date: | 29-Mar-1994 |
Test Location: | Nevada, USA |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 8.2% average improvement on 6 Caterpillar 3512 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 6.8% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTA 38C engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 4.8% average improvement on 3 MTU 16V396 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: -7.0% average improvement on 5 Caterpillar 3512 engines via CO testing 100.0% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTA 38C engines via CO testing 4.4% average improvement on 3 MTU 16V396 engines via CO testing 12.9% average improvement on 6 Caterpillar 3512 engines via CO2 testing 6.7% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTA 38C engines via CO2 testing 5.0% average improvement on 3 MTU 16V396 engines via CO2 testing 16.8% average improvement on 6 Caterpillar 3512 engines via HC testing 28.9% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTA 38C engines via HC testing 33.5% average improvement on 3 MTU 16V396 engines via HC testing 19.3% average improvement on 5 Caterpillar 3512 engines via Smoke Spot testing 28.1% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTA 38C engines via Smoke Spot testing 9.4% average improvement on 3 MTU 16V396 engines via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 12 of 44
Test Id: | 57 |
---|---|
Title: | Fimiston Open Pit |
File Size: | 0.117 MB |
Industries: | Mining |
Report Type: | Field Test |
Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 1-Sep-1997 |
Test Date: | 28-Jun-1997 |
Test Location: | Western Australia, Australia |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 3.9% average improvement on 4 Caterpillar 789 engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing Withdrawl Results (i.e. what happened after treatment was stopped): -4.0% average improvement on 4 Caterpillar 789 engines via Withdrawal testing |
Result 13 of 44
Test Id: | 188 |
---|---|
Title: | FMC Testimonial |
File Size: | 0.069 MB |
Industries: | Mining |
Report Type: | Testimonial |
Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 29-Sep-1993 |
Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
Test Location: | Idaho, USA |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 10.0% improvement on an engine via Statistical testing Engine Emissions Results: 15.0% improvement on an engine via CO testing 40.0% improvement on an engine via HC testing 16.0% improvement on an engine via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 14 of 44
Test Id: | 94 |
---|---|
Title: | FMC, Dry Valley Mine |
File Size: | 3.820 MB |
Industries: | Mining |
Report Type: | Field Test |
Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 2-Aug-1993 |
Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
Test Location: | Idaho, USA |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 12.2% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3512 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 12.6% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3512 engines via CO testing 11.4% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3512 engines via CO2 testing 28.7% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3512 engines via HC testing 16.3% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3512 engines via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 15 of 44
Test Id: | 95 |
---|---|
Title: | FMC, Skull Point Field Trial |
File Size: | 28.206 MB |
Industries: | Mining |
Report Type: | Field Test |
Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 26-Jun-1994 |
Test Date: | 21-Jul-1994 |
Test Location: | Wyoming, USA |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 7.6% improvement on a Caterpillar 3408 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 7.9% improvement on a Caterpillar 3412 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 6.2% improvement on a Caterpillar 3512 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 11.4% improvement on a Cummins 350 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 10.0% improvement on a Cummins KTA19C engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 0.6% improvement on a Caterpillar 3408 engine via CO testing 6.2% improvement on a Caterpillar 3412 engine via CO testing 10.0% improvement on a Caterpillar 3512 engine via CO testing 65.1% improvement on a Cummins 350 engine via CO testing -0.6% improvement on a Cummins KTA19C engine via CO testing 6.6% improvement on a Caterpillar 3408 engine via CO2 testing 6.7% improvement on a Caterpillar 3412 engine via CO2 testing 2.4% improvement on a Caterpillar 3512 engine via CO2 testing 11.4% improvement on a Cummins 350 engine via CO2 testing 14.0% improvement on a Cummins KTA19C engine via CO2 testing 64.2% improvement on a Caterpillar 3408 engine via HC testing 19.9% improvement on a Caterpillar 3512 engine via HC testing 4.8% improvement on a Cummins KTA19C engine via HC testing |
Result 16 of 44
Test Id: | 173 |
---|---|
Title: | Fuel Technology |
File Size: | 10.129 MB |
Industries: | Mining |
Report Type: | Publication |
Benefits: | Biocide, Carbon in engine, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 1-May-1989 |
Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
Test Location: | Western Australia, Australia |
Summary: | No summary available. Please download the full report by clicking the link in the Title section above. |
Result 17 of 44
Test Id: | 34 |
---|---|
Title: | Goonyella |
File Size: | 0.131 MB |
Industries: | Mining |
Report Type: | Field Test |
Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 1-Jan-2001 |
Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
Test Location: | Queensland Australia, Australia |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 5.7% improvement on a Caterpillar 784B engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing 6.1% improvement on a Caterpillar 793B engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing |
Result 18 of 44
Test Id: | 55 |
---|---|
Title: | Granny Smith Mine |
File Size: | 0.091 MB |
Industries: | Generators, Mining |
Report Type: | Field Test |
Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 1-Jun-1999 |
Test Date: | 12-Apr-1999 |
Test Location: | New South Wales, Australia |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 3.6% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3612 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 4.1% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3612 engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing Engine Emissions Results: 5.5% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3612 engines via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 19 of 44
Test Id: | 48 |
---|---|
Title: | KCGM Super Pit |
File Size: | 0.187 MB |
Industries: | Mining |
Report Type: | Field Test |
Benefits: | Biocide, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 1-Aug-2003 |
Test Date: | 19-Jul-2003 |
Test Location: | Western Australia, Australia |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 5.6% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 793B engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing |
Result 20 of 44
Test Id: | 49 |
---|---|
Title: | Kennecott Copper |
File Size: | 26.441 MB |
Industries: | Mining |
Report Type: | Field Test |
Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
Report Date: | 12-Apr-1995 |
Test Date: | 27-Feb-1995 |
Test Location: | Utah, USA |
Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 9.5% average improvement on 4 Caterpillar 3516 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 4.7% improvement on a Caterpillar 3612 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 7.2% average improvement on 4 Caterpillar 3516 engines via CO testing -7.3% improvement on a Caterpillar 3612 engine via CO testing 6.8% average improvement on 4 Caterpillar 3516 engines via CO2 testing 3.7% improvement on a Caterpillar 3612 engine via CO2 testing 5.1% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3516 engines via HC testing 24.4% improvement on a Caterpillar 3612 engine via HC testing 12.2% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3516 engines via Smoke Spot testing 6.7% improvement on a Caterpillar 3612 engine via Smoke Spot testing |
Show previous 10 documents | Show all documents on one page | Show next 10 documents |