Test Results Matching your Search
Click here to start another test report search.
There are 67 documents that match your query. These 67 documents contain a total of 1,430 individual test. The documents are listed below. You can click the title of the report to bring up a PDF version of the report in a new browser window. You will need Adobe Acrobat Reader to view the documents.
Executive Summary for Document Search
This search included results from:
- 27 locations
 - 7 different industries
 - 4 different fuel types
 - 28 different engine manufacturers
 - 89 different engine types
 - 1 test procedure
 
The aggregate results for the tests in this search criteria show:
- 45 Specific Fuel Consumption tests were performed with an average improvement of 3.530%
 - 317 Carbon Mass Balance tests were performed with an average improvement of 7.078%
 - 12 Statistical tests were performed with an average improvement of 7.000%
 - 319 Smoke Spot tests were performed with an average improvement of 22.616%
 - 1 NOx tests were performed with an average improvement of 5.000%
 - 226 CO tests were performed with an average improvement of 7.142%
 - 225 HC tests were performed with an average improvement of 11.366%
 - 234 CO2 tests were performed with an average improvement of 7.099%
 - 27 Wear Metals tests were performed with an average improvement of 29.015%
 - 19 Oil Consumption tests were performed with an average improvement of 32.389%
 - 5 Withdrawal tests were performed with an average improvement of -7.700%
 
Result 31 of 67
| Test Id: | 94 | 
|---|---|
| Title: | FMC, Dry Valley Mine | 
| File Size: | 3.820 MB | 
| Industries: | Mining | 
| Report Type: | Field Test | 
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy | 
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) | 
| Report Date: | 2-Aug-1993 | 
| Test Date: | Not Given in Report | 
| Test Location: | Idaho, USA | 
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 12.2% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3512 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 12.6% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3512 engines via CO testing 11.4% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3512 engines via CO2 testing 28.7% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3512 engines via HC testing 16.3% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3512 engines via Smoke Spot testing  | 
	
Result 32 of 67
| Test Id: | 20 | 
|---|---|
| Title: | Freight Australia | 
| File Size: | 5.570 MB | 
| Industries: | Railroad | 
| Report Type: | Field Test | 
| Benefits: | Biocide, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear, Wayside fires | 
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) | 
| Report Date: | 1-Sep-2000 | 
| Test Date: | 23-Jul-2000 | 
| Test Location: | Southern Australia, Australia | 
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 7.2% average improvement on 8 EMD G16C engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 34.9% average improvement on 8 EMD G16C engines via Smoke Spot testing  | 
	
Result 33 of 67
| Test Id: | 7 | 
|---|---|
| Title: | Freight Corp. | 
| File Size: | 6.225 MB | 
| Industries: | Railroad | 
| Report Type: | Field Test | 
| Benefits: | Biocide, Emission credit, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear, Wayside fires | 
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) | 
| Report Date: | 1-Aug-2000 | 
| Test Date: | 25-May-2000 | 
| Test Location: | Southern Australia, Australia | 
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 2.9% average improvement on 12 EMD 710G3A engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 42.6% average improvement on 2 EMD 710G3A engines via Smoke Spot testing  | 
	
Result 34 of 67
| Test Id: | 153 | 
|---|---|
| Title: | Furnace Evaluation | 
| File Size: | 4.734 MB | 
| Industries: | Boiler | 
| Report Type: | Field Test | 
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear | 
| Fuels: | 4D Diesel (Bunker C, Heavy Fuel Oil, 380 centistoke) | 
| Report Date: | 29-Dec-1981 | 
| Test Date: | Not Given in Report | 
| Test Location: | Not Given in Report | 
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 6.6% improvement on a Boiler engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing Engine Emissions Results: 100.0% improvement on a Boiler engine via Smoke Spot testing  | 
	
Result 35 of 67
| Test Id: | 72 | 
|---|---|
| Title: | Geneva Steel | 
| File Size: | 7.723 MB | 
| Industries: | Railroad | 
| Report Type: | Field Test | 
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear | 
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) | 
| Report Date: | 22-Feb-1999 | 
| Test Date: | 12-Apr-1997 | 
| Test Location: | Utah, USA | 
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 5.5% average improvement on 2 EMD SW1200 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 10.1% average improvement on 2 EMD SW1500 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 8.3% average improvement on 2 EMD SW1200 engines via CO testing -8.1% improvement on a EMD SW1500 engine via CO testing 7.2% average improvement on 2 EMD SW1200 engines via CO2 testing 19.1% average improvement on 2 EMD SW1500 engines via CO2 testing 89.3% average improvement on 2 EMD SW1200 engines via HC testing 22.5% average improvement on 2 EMD SW1500 engines via HC testing 11.2% average improvement on 2 EMD SW1200 engines via Smoke Spot testing 17.7% average improvement on 2 EMD SW1500 engines via Smoke Spot testing  | 
	
Result 36 of 67
| Test Id: | 55 | 
|---|---|
| Title: | Granny Smith Mine | 
| File Size: | 0.091 MB | 
| Industries: | Generators, Mining | 
| Report Type: | Field Test | 
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear | 
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) | 
| Report Date: | 1-Jun-1999 | 
| Test Date: | 12-Apr-1999 | 
| Test Location: | New South Wales, Australia | 
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 3.6% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3612 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 4.1% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3612 engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing Engine Emissions Results: 5.5% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3612 engines via Smoke Spot testing  | 
	
Result 37 of 67
| Test Id: | 98 | 
|---|---|
| Title: | Gujarat | 
| File Size: | 21.654 MB | 
| Industries: | Buses | 
| Report Type: | Field Test | 
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy | 
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) | 
| Report Date: | 30-Jun-1994 | 
| Test Date: | 11-Feb-1992 | 
| Test Location: | Gujarat, India | 
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 5.9% average improvement on 5 Hino Bus engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 12.4% improvement on a Leyland 665 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 3.9% improvement on a Viking 370 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 2.3% average improvement on 5 Hino Bus engines via CO2 testing 6.7% improvement on a Leyland 665 engine via CO2 testing -0.8% improvement on a Viking 370 engine via CO2 testing -4.8% average improvement on 5 Hino Bus engines via HC testing 17.3% improvement on a Leyland 665 engine via HC testing 10.6% improvement on a Viking 370 engine via HC testing 22.5% average improvement on 4 Hino Bus engines via Smoke Spot testing 33.0% improvement on a Leyland 665 engine via Smoke Spot testing 43.0% improvement on a Viking 370 engine via Smoke Spot testing  | 
	
Result 38 of 67
| Test Id: | 99 | 
|---|---|
| Title: | Hillsborough County School | 
| File Size: | 46.021 MB | 
| Industries: | Buses | 
| Report Type: | Field Test | 
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy | 
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) | 
| Report Date: | 11-Aug-1994 | 
| Test Date: | 5-Apr-1994 | 
| Test Location: | Florida, USA | 
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 3.8% average improvement on 2 International 6.9 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 4.5% average improvement on 2 International 9.0 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 6.3% average improvement on 2 International DT466 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 13.9% average improvement on 2 International 6.9 engines via CO testing 20.9% average improvement on 2 International 9.0 engines via CO testing 16.4% average improvement on 2 International DT466 engines via CO testing 5.5% average improvement on 2 International 6.9 engines via CO2 testing 4.5% average improvement on 2 International 9.0 engines via CO2 testing 6.0% average improvement on 2 International DT466 engines via CO2 testing 10.3% average improvement on 2 International 6.9 engines via HC testing -22.4% average improvement on 2 International 9.0 engines via HC testing 11.6% average improvement on 2 International DT466 engines via HC testing 17.0% average improvement on 2 International 6.9 engines via Smoke Spot testing 41.0% average improvement on 2 International 9.0 engines via Smoke Spot testing 0.0% improvement on a International DT466 engine via Smoke Spot testing  | 
	
Result 39 of 67
| Test Id: | 178 | 
|---|---|
| Title: | Indiana Harbor Belt RR | 
| File Size: | 3.366 MB | 
| Industries: | Railroad | 
| Report Type: | Testimonial | 
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy | 
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) | 
| Report Date: | 25-Feb-1998 | 
| Test Date: | Not Given in Report | 
| Test Location: | Indiana, USA | 
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 7.7% improvement on a EMD GP38-2 engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing 7.7% improvement on a EMD SD40 engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing 7.7% improvement on a EMD SW1500 engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing Engine Emissions Results: 21.0% improvement on a EMD GP38-2 engine via Smoke Spot testing 21.0% improvement on a EMD SD40 engine via Smoke Spot testing 21.0% improvement on a EMD SW1500 engine via Smoke Spot testing  | 
	
Result 40 of 67
| Test Id: | 24 | 
|---|---|
| Title: | Interlink Express | 
| File Size: | 9.470 MB | 
| Industries: | Trucking | 
| Report Type: | Field Test | 
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy | 
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) | 
| Report Date: | 14-Dec-1995 | 
| Test Date: | 19-Jul-1995 | 
| Test Location: | England, England | 
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 2.5% improvement on a Mer 1820 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 2.5% improvement on a Mer 1834 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: -47.7% improvement on a Mer 1820 engine via CO testing -16.8% improvement on a Mer 1834 engine via CO testing 8.1% improvement on a Mer 1820 engine via CO2 testing 6.5% improvement on a Mer 1834 engine via CO2 testing 17.8% improvement on a Mer 1820 engine via HC testing -1.1% improvement on a Mer 1834 engine via HC testing 23.0% improvement on a Mer 1820 engine via Smoke Spot testing 23.0% improvement on a Mer 1834 engine via Smoke Spot testing  | 
	
| Show previous 10 documents | Show all documents on one page | Show next 10 documents |