Test Results Matching your Search
Click here to start another test report search.
There are 57 documents that match your query. These 57 documents contain a total of 394 individual tests. The documents are listed below. You can click the title of the report to bring up a PDF version of the report in a new browser window. You will need Adobe Acrobat Reader to view the documents.
Executive Summary for Document Search
This search included results from:
- 23 locations
- 7 different industries
- 3 different fuel types
- 26 different engine manufacturers
- 52 different engine types
- 1 test procedure
The aggregate results for the tests in this search criteria show:
- 205 Specific Fuel Consumption tests were performed with an average improvement of 4.040%
- 33 Carbon Mass Balance tests were performed with an average improvement of 5.875%
- 3 Statistical tests were performed with an average improvement of 4.293%
- 40 Smoke Spot tests were performed with an average improvement of 24.884%
- 6 NOx tests were performed with an average improvement of 3.208%
- 41 CO tests were performed with an average improvement of 10.316%
- 31 HC tests were performed with an average improvement of 28.745%
- 30 CO2 tests were performed with an average improvement of 6.347%
- 4 Withdrawal tests were performed with an average improvement of -4.025%
- 1 SO2 tests were performed with an average improvement of 21.000%
Result 11 of 57
| Test Id: | 217 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Carosue Dam |
| File Size: | 0.943 MB |
| Industries: | Generators |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 1-Dec-2011 |
| Test Date: | 6-Sep-2011 |
| Test Location: | Western Australia, Australia |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 2.7% improvement on a Cummins KTA50 engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing |
Result 12 of 57
| Test Id: | 13 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Central Electricty Board Mauritius |
| File Size: | 3.989 MB |
| Industries: | Generators |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 1-Nov-1997 |
| Test Date: | 4-Aug-1997 |
| Test Location: | Eastern Australia, Australia |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 5.6% average improvement on 4 Pielstick 18 PC3 engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing |
Result 13 of 57
| Test Id: | 140 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Central Electricty Board Mauritius 2 |
| File Size: | 8.617 MB |
| Industries: | Generators |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 1-May-1999 |
| Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
| Test Location: | Eastern Australia, Australia |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 2.2% average improvement on 6 Pielstick 18 PC3 engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing |
Result 14 of 57
| Test Id: | 41 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Central Norsman |
| File Size: | 0.095 MB |
| Industries: | Generators, Mining |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 1-May-2004 |
| Test Date: | 21-Apr-2004 |
| Test Location: | Western Australia, Australia |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 3.9% average improvement on 4 Cummins KTA50 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 3.5% average improvement on 4 Cummins KTA50 engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing Engine Emissions Results: 55.9% average improvement on 4 Cummins KTA50 engines via CO testing 10.8% average improvement on 4 Cummins KTA50 engines via CO2 testing 68.4% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTA50 engines via HC testing 29.0% average improvement on 4 Cummins KTA50 engines via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 15 of 57
| Test Id: | 6 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Central Oregon & Pacific Railroad |
| File Size: | 13.241 MB |
| Industries: | Railroad |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 16-Nov-1998 |
| Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
| Test Location: | Oregon, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 4.4% improvement on a EMD 645E engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 3.3% improvement on a EMD 645E engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing Engine Emissions Results: 13.3% improvement on a EMD 645E engine via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 16 of 57
| Test Id: | 162 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Commercial Carrier Corporation 
|
| File Size: | 3.342 MB |
| Industries: | Trucking |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 26-Sep-1990 |
| Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
| Test Location: | Florida, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 6.8% average improvement on 10 Mack 300 engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing Engine Emissions Results: 31.7% average improvement on 5 Mack 300 engines via CO testing 8.6% average improvement on 5 Mack 300 engines via HC testing |
Result 17 of 57
| Test Id: | 17 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Customer Trial Evaluation Maritrans |
| File Size: | 5.262 MB |
| Industries: | Marine |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 26-Nov-1987 |
| Test Date: | 1-Sep-1987 |
| Test Location: | Pennsylvania, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 5.5% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 399 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 4.0% improvement on a EMD 567BC engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 8.2% improvement on a EMD 645E engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 3.6% improvement on a Caterpillar 399 engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing 5.7% improvement on a EMD 567BC engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing 5.0% improvement on a EMD 645E engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing Engine Emissions Results: 21.7% improvement on a Caterpillar 399 engine via CO testing 5.4% improvement on a EMD 567BC engine via CO testing 45.5% improvement on a EMD 645E engine via CO testing 5.0% improvement on a Caterpillar 399 engine via CO2 testing 17.9% improvement on a EMD 567BC engine via CO2 testing 11.9% improvement on a EMD 645E engine via CO2 testing 6.7% improvement on a Caterpillar 399 engine via HC testing -34.3% improvement on a EMD 567BC engine via HC testing 7.1% improvement on a EMD 645E engine via HC testing |
Result 18 of 57
| Test Id: | 44 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Dominion Mining |
| File Size: | 12.589 MB |
| Industries: | Generators, Mining |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 27-May-1994 |
| Test Date: | 30-Mar-1994 |
| Test Location: | Western Australia, Australia |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 3.6% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTA50 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 3.3% average improvement on 3 Cummins KTA50 engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing Engine Emissions Results: 8.4% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTA50 engines via CO testing 6.4% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTA50 engines via CO2 testing 2.7% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTA50 engines via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 19 of 57
| Test Id: | 131 |
|---|---|
| Title: | ESDC (RP-503, SFAT, AAR 3-Mode) Report for Go Transit |
| File Size: | 0.149 MB |
| Industries: | Railroad |
| Report Type: | Laboratory Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 28-Feb-2003 |
| Test Date: | 11-Feb-2003 |
| Test Location: | Quebec, Canada |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 3.5% average improvement on 3 EMD 710G3A engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing Engine Emissions Results: 2.8% improvement on a EMD 710G3A engine via CO testing 5.8% improvement on a EMD 710G3A engine via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 20 of 57
| Test Id: | 221 |
|---|---|
| Title: | FerroMex |
| File Size: | 1.810 MB |
| Industries: | Railroad |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 24-Jan-2012 |
| Test Date: | 20-Nov-2011 |
| Test Location: | Mexico, Mexico |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 4.5% improvement on a GE C-30 Super 7 engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing |
| Show previous 10 documents | Show all documents on one page | Show next 10 documents |