|
| FTC POWER STATION EVALUATION
ABSTRACT A controlled evaluation of FTCs performance was conducted during the period 4th August 1997 to 13th October 1997 at Central Electricity Board, Mauritius, St Louis Power Station. Measurements of fuel efficiency were made on Unit No. 6, a Pielstick 18 PC3 diesel alternator set, employing the Specific Fuel Consumption (SFC) method. Improved fuel efficiency following introduction of the FTC Catalyst was 5.45%. TEST METHOD The SFC test procedure employed in this efficiency study measures the absolute mass of fuel consumed against power generated by the engine over time at a constant load. From this data the engines efficiency can be calculated. The evaluation of FTC involved a series of back to back untreated (baseline) and treated fuel tests conducted approximately two months apart. MEASUREMENT OF FUEL CONSUMED A pair of calibrated MacNaught M40 flow transducers were used to measure fuel supplied to the engine and also fuel returning from the engine from which the net volume of fuel consumed over a given timespan at ten minutes intervals can be assessed. The flow meters were fitted with thermocouple probes which enable measurement of fuel temperature at each transducer. From the fuel temperature the density at that temperature is calculated. A sample of the fuel oil (180 cSt grade) was taken for laboratory analysis and the density at 15°C determined. Volumetric fuel flows are corrected for density and temperatures and reported in mass (kg) of fuel. MEASUREMENT OF WORK DONE A Microvip MKII energy analyser was used to measure the alternators electrical output parameters, namely:-
TEST PROCEDURE Once the meters were installed into the fuel lines and the Microvip energy analyser connected to the control panel a pair of stopwatches were synchronised and data extracted at ten (10) minute intervals and recorded. TEST RESULTS A summary of the Mean Results achieved in this test program are shown in Table 1 below: TABLE 1
A linear trend analysis has also been made as shown in Table 2 below and showed graphically in Graph No. 1 TABLE 2
GRAPH NO. 1
Photograph No.1 KEP rate meter and Fluke digital
thermometer at the fuel measurement
Photograph No. 2 Microvip Energy Analyser connected to the rear of the switchboard
CONCLUSION The reduced fuel consumption measured by this engineering standard procedure confirms the potential for the FTC catalyst to reduce operating costs. Additional benefits provided by the catalyst are less engine carbon deposits and reduced greenhouse gas emission. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fuel Technology Pty. Ltd.
ACN 100 293 490