T E C H N I C A L    B U L L E T I N

No. &nbs111-98p;   111-98


 

FTC POWER STATION EVALUATION
PROVES IMPROVED FUEL EFFICIENCY

 

ABSTRACT

A controlled evaluation of FTC’s performance was conducted during the period 4th August 1997 to 13th October 1997 at Central Electricity Board, Mauritius, St Louis Power Station. Measurements of fuel efficiency were made on Unit No. 6, a Pielstick 18 PC3 diesel alternator set, employing the Specific Fuel Consumption (SFC) method.

Improved fuel efficiency following introduction of the FTC Catalyst was 5.45%.

TEST METHOD

The SFC test procedure employed in this efficiency study measures the absolute mass of fuel consumed against power generated by the engine over time at a constant load. From this data the engine’s efficiency can be calculated.

The evaluation of FTC involved a series of back to back untreated (baseline) and treated fuel tests conducted approximately two months apart.

MEASUREMENT OF FUEL CONSUMED

A pair of calibrated MacNaught M40 flow transducers were used to measure fuel supplied to the engine and also fuel returning from the engine from which the net volume of fuel consumed over a given timespan at ten minutes intervals can be assessed.

The flow meters were fitted with thermocouple probes which enable measurement of fuel temperature at each transducer.

From the fuel temperature the density at that temperature is calculated. A sample of the fuel oil (180 cSt grade) was taken for laboratory analysis and the density at 15°C determined.

Volumetric fuel flows are corrected for density and temperatures and reported in mass (kg) of fuel.

MEASUREMENT OF WORK DONE

A Microvip MKII energy analyser was used to measure the alternator’s electrical output parameters, namely:-

KWatt
Ampere
Volt
kVArh
kWh
Hours
Hz
PF Med
LmA
MVAr

  

TEST PROCEDURE

Once the meters were installed into the fuel lines and the Microvip energy analyser connected to the control panel a pair of stopwatches were synchronised and data extracted at ten (10) minute intervals and recorded.

TEST RESULTS

A summary of the Mean Results achieved in this test program are shown in Table 1 below:

TABLE 1

  Mean Results
Nominal Load (kw) 6000 7000 8000 8500 Overall Average
  Load kg/kWh Load kg/kWh Load kg/kWh Load kg/kWh Load kg/kWh
Untreated 5971 0.2313 7290 0.2185 7785 0.2270 8522 0.2176 7392 0.2236
Treated 5963 0.2148 7474 0.2080 8271 0.2110 8681 0.2099 7597 0.2109
% Change -0.1% -7.1% 2.5% -4.8% 6.2% -7.1% 1.9% -3.6% 2.8% -5.7%

 

A linear trend analysis has also been made as shown in Table 2 below and showed graphically in Graph No. 1

TABLE 2

 

GRAPH NO. 1

 

Photograph No.1 – KEP rate meter and Fluke digital thermometer at the fuel measurement
Recording station

 

 

Photograph No. 2 – Microvip Energy Analyser connected to the rear of the switchboard

 

CONCLUSION

The reduced fuel consumption measured by this engineering standard procedure confirms the potential for the FTC catalyst to reduce operating costs. Additional benefits provided by the catalyst are less engine carbon deposits and reduced greenhouse gas emission.

 


Fuel Technology Pty. Ltd.  ACN 100 293 490
2 Tipping Road, Kewdale, Western Australia, 6105
Telephone (08) 9353; 1016 Facsimile (08) 9353 1013; Email  fueltech@iinet.net.au
60 Formation Street, Wacol, Queensland, 4076. Telephone (07) 3271 4138 Facsimile (07) 3271 5739