Test Results Matching your Search
Click here to start another test report search.
There is 1 document that matches your query. This 1 document contains a total of 65 individual tests. The document is listed below. You can click the title of the report to bring up a PDF version of the report in a new browser window. You will need Adobe Acrobat Reader to view the documents.
Executive Summary for Document Search
This search included results from:
- 1 location
- 1 industry
- 1 type of fuel
- 4 different engine manufacturers
- 10 different engine types
- 5 different test procedures
The aggregate results for the tests in this search criteria show:
- 13 Carbon Mass Balance tests were performed with an average improvement of 7.441%
- 13 Smoke Spot tests were performed with an average improvement of 16.198%
- 13 CO tests were performed with an average improvement of 22.055%
- 13 HC tests were performed with an average improvement of 2.835%
- 13 CO2 tests were performed with an average improvement of 7.102%
Result 1 of 1
| Test Id: | 80 |
|---|---|
| Title: | BFI Holding |
| File Size: | 16.594 MB |
| Industries: | Trucking |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 18-Nov-1994 |
| Test Date: | 7-Sep-1994 |
| Test Location: | Duiven, Netherlands |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 10.1% average improvement on 3 DAF 2300 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing -3.5% improvement on a DAF 2500 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 6.7% improvement on a DAF 65 180 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 13.4% improvement on a DAF 75 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 5.6% average improvement on 2 DAF 75S 240 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 7.9% average improvement on 2 DAF 85 330 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 8.8% improvement on a Mercedes 3528 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 3.7% improvement on a Scania 81 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 10.2% improvement on a Scania 93H 280 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 24.7% average improvement on 3 DAF 2300 engines via CO testing 1.6% improvement on a DAF 2500 engine via CO testing 32.8% improvement on a DAF 65 180 engine via CO testing 24.0% improvement on a DAF 75 engine via CO testing 12.9% average improvement on 2 DAF 75S 240 engines via CO testing 19.9% average improvement on 2 DAF 85 330 engines via CO testing 35.4% improvement on a Mercedes 3528 engine via CO testing 26.8% improvement on a Scania 81 engine via CO testing 26.2% improvement on a Sulzer 11,000 SHP engine via CO testing 8.0% average improvement on 3 DAF 2300 engines via CO2 testing 1.9% improvement on a DAF 2500 engine via CO2 testing 12.0% improvement on a DAF 65 180 engine via CO2 testing 9.6% improvement on a DAF 75 engine via CO2 testing 8.6% average improvement on 2 DAF 75S 240 engines via CO2 testing 9.8% average improvement on 2 DAF 85 330 engines via CO2 testing 8.6% improvement on a Mercedes 3528 engine via CO2 testing -7.0% improvement on a Scania 81 engine via CO2 testing 6.7% improvement on a Scania 93H 280 engine via CO2 testing 1.1% average improvement on 3 DAF 2300 engines via HC testing 23.4% improvement on a DAF 2500 engine via HC testing -24.9% improvement on a DAF 65 180 engine via HC testing 4.3% improvement on a DAF 75 engine via HC testing 10.9% average improvement on 2 DAF 75S 240 engines via HC testing 0.3% average improvement on 2 DAF 85 330 engines via HC testing 3.0% improvement on a Mercedes 3528 engine via HC testing 0.9% improvement on a Scania 81 engine via HC testing 4.3% improvement on a Scania 93H 280 engine via HC testing 14.1% average improvement on 4 DAF 2300 engines via Smoke Spot testing 12.5% improvement on a DAF 2500 engine via Smoke Spot testing 14.3% improvement on a DAF 65 180 engine via Smoke Spot testing 12.5% improvement on a DAF 75 engine via Smoke Spot testing -14.3% improvement on a DAF 75S 240 engine via Smoke Spot testing 15.0% average improvement on 2 DAF 85 330 engines via Smoke Spot testing 25.0% improvement on a Mercedes 3528 engine via Smoke Spot testing 45.5% improvement on a Scania 81 engine via Smoke Spot testing 28.6% improvement on a Scania 93H 280 engine via Smoke Spot testing |