Test Results Matching your Search
Click here to start another test report search.
There are 165 documents that match your query. These 165 documents contain a total of 2,328 individual tests. The documents are listed below. You can click the title of the report to bring up a PDF version of the report in a new browser window. You will need Adobe Acrobat Reader to view the documents.
Executive Summary for Document Search
This search included results from:
- 48 locations
- 7 different industries
- 5 different fuel types
- 52 different engine manufacturers
- 185 different engine types
- 12 different test procedures
The aggregate results for the tests in this search criteria show:
- 112 Specific Fuel Consumption tests were performed with an average improvement of 4.486%
- 585 Carbon Mass Balance tests were performed with an average improvement of 8.109%
- 29 Statistical tests were performed with an average improvement of 7.291%
- 318 Smoke Spot tests were performed with an average improvement of 22.636%
- 19 NOx tests were performed with an average improvement of 6.776%
- 382 CO tests were performed with an average improvement of 10.632%
- 396 HC tests were performed with an average improvement of 10.706%
- 414 CO2 tests were performed with an average improvement of 8.907%
- 12 Wear Metals tests were performed with an average improvement of 37.442%
- 19 Oil Consumption tests were performed with an average improvement of 32.389%
- 9 Withdrawal tests were performed with an average improvement of -6.067%
- 33 SO2 tests were performed with an average improvement of 27.952%
Result 11 of 165
| Test Id: | 14 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Bellevue Gold Mine Power Station |
| File Size: | 13.352 MB |
| Industries: | Generators |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 1-Dec-1992 |
| Test Date: | 25-Oct-1992 |
| Test Location: | Western Australia, Australia |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 1.0% improvement on a Cummins KTA38 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 7.1% average improvement on 3 Cummins KTA50 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing -2.2% improvement on a Cummins KTA38 engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing 2.3% average improvement on 9 Cummins KTA50 engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing Engine Emissions Results: -4.4% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTA38 engines via CO testing -45.7% average improvement on 6 Cummins KTA50 engines via CO testing -10.2% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTA38 engines via CO2 testing 7.5% average improvement on 6 Cummins KTA50 engines via CO2 testing 100.0% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTA38 engines via HC testing 38.0% average improvement on 6 Cummins KTA50 engines via HC testing 38.5% improvement on a Cummins KTA38 engine via Smoke Spot testing 0.0% improvement on a Cummins KTA50 engine via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 12 of 165
| Test Id: | 80 |
|---|---|
| Title: | BFI Holding |
| File Size: | 16.594 MB |
| Industries: | Trucking |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 18-Nov-1994 |
| Test Date: | 7-Sep-1994 |
| Test Location: | Duiven, Netherlands |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 10.1% average improvement on 3 DAF 2300 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing -3.5% improvement on a DAF 2500 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 6.7% improvement on a DAF 65 180 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 13.4% improvement on a DAF 75 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 5.6% average improvement on 2 DAF 75S 240 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 7.9% average improvement on 2 DAF 85 330 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 8.8% improvement on a Mercedes 3528 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 3.7% improvement on a Scania 81 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 10.2% improvement on a Scania 93H 280 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 24.7% average improvement on 3 DAF 2300 engines via CO testing 1.6% improvement on a DAF 2500 engine via CO testing 32.8% improvement on a DAF 65 180 engine via CO testing 24.0% improvement on a DAF 75 engine via CO testing 12.9% average improvement on 2 DAF 75S 240 engines via CO testing 19.9% average improvement on 2 DAF 85 330 engines via CO testing 35.4% improvement on a Mercedes 3528 engine via CO testing 26.8% improvement on a Scania 81 engine via CO testing 26.2% improvement on a Sulzer 11,000 SHP engine via CO testing 8.0% average improvement on 3 DAF 2300 engines via CO2 testing 1.9% improvement on a DAF 2500 engine via CO2 testing 12.0% improvement on a DAF 65 180 engine via CO2 testing 9.6% improvement on a DAF 75 engine via CO2 testing 8.6% average improvement on 2 DAF 75S 240 engines via CO2 testing 9.8% average improvement on 2 DAF 85 330 engines via CO2 testing 8.6% improvement on a Mercedes 3528 engine via CO2 testing -7.0% improvement on a Scania 81 engine via CO2 testing 6.7% improvement on a Scania 93H 280 engine via CO2 testing 1.1% average improvement on 3 DAF 2300 engines via HC testing 23.4% improvement on a DAF 2500 engine via HC testing -24.9% improvement on a DAF 65 180 engine via HC testing 4.3% improvement on a DAF 75 engine via HC testing 10.9% average improvement on 2 DAF 75S 240 engines via HC testing 0.3% average improvement on 2 DAF 85 330 engines via HC testing 3.0% improvement on a Mercedes 3528 engine via HC testing 0.9% improvement on a Scania 81 engine via HC testing 4.3% improvement on a Scania 93H 280 engine via HC testing 14.1% average improvement on 4 DAF 2300 engines via Smoke Spot testing 12.5% improvement on a DAF 2500 engine via Smoke Spot testing 14.3% improvement on a DAF 65 180 engine via Smoke Spot testing 12.5% improvement on a DAF 75 engine via Smoke Spot testing -14.3% improvement on a DAF 75S 240 engine via Smoke Spot testing 15.0% average improvement on 2 DAF 85 330 engines via Smoke Spot testing 25.0% improvement on a Mercedes 3528 engine via Smoke Spot testing 45.5% improvement on a Scania 81 engine via Smoke Spot testing 28.6% improvement on a Scania 93H 280 engine via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 13 of 165
| Test Id: | 39 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Big Bell Mine |
| File Size: | 0.051 MB |
| Industries: | Generators, Mining |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 1-Sep-1999 |
| Test Date: | 16-Aug-1999 |
| Test Location: | Western Australia, Australia |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 4.4% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3612 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 2.4% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3612 engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing Engine Emissions Results: 0.0% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3612 engines via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 14 of 165
| Test Id: | 40 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Blue Circle Cement |
| File Size: | 0.067 MB |
| Industries: | Mining |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 1-Aug-1997 |
| Test Date: | 1-Mar-1997 |
| Test Location: | Queensland Australia, Australia |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 6.7% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 777A engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 4.5% average improvement on 5 Caterpillar 777A engines via Statistical testing Engine Emissions Results: 2.4% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 777A engines via Smoke Spot testing Withdrawl Results (i.e. what happened after treatment was stopped): -7.7% average improvement on 5 Caterpillar 777A engines via Withdrawal testing |
Result 15 of 165
| Test Id: | 144 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Boiler Efficiency |
| File Size: | 8.345 MB |
| Industries: | Boiler |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
| Fuels: | 4D Diesel (Bunker C, Heavy Fuel Oil, 380 centistoke) |
| Report Date: | 9-Aug-1983 |
| Test Date: | 19-Apr-1983 |
| Test Location: | North Carolina, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 1.6% improvement on a Boiler engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing |
Result 16 of 165
| Test Id: | 150 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Boiler Efficiency and Sludge Control |
| File Size: | 17.635 MB |
| Industries: | Boiler |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
| Fuels: | 4D Diesel (Bunker C, Heavy Fuel Oil, 380 centistoke) |
| Report Date: | Not Given in Report |
| Test Date: | 19-Apr-1983 |
| Test Location: | North Carolina, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 2.6% improvement on a Boiler engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing |
Result 17 of 165
| Test Id: | 27 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Boise Cascade Corporation |
| File Size: | 12.213 MB |
| Industries: | Trucking |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 10-Aug-1993 |
| Test Date: | 3-Aug-1993 |
| Test Location: | Idaho, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 13.4% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3306 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 5.2% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3408 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 7.5% average improvement on 2 Perkins In-Line 6 1006-6 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 18.0% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3306 engines via CO testing 9.0% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3408 engines via CO testing 11.9% average improvement on 2 Perkins In-Line 6 1006-6 engines via CO testing 10.0% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3306 engines via CO2 testing -0.7% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3408 engines via CO2 testing -0.3% average improvement on 2 Perkins In-Line 6 1006-6 engines via CO2 testing -6.6% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3306 engines via HC testing -19.8% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3408 engines via HC testing -39.5% average improvement on 2 Perkins In-Line 6 1006-6 engines via HC testing |
Result 18 of 165
| Test Id: | 81 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Boise Urban Stages |
| File Size: | 6.812 MB |
| Industries: | Buses |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 10-Aug-1993 |
| Test Date: | 1-Aug-1993 |
| Test Location: | Idaho, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 6.3% improvement on a Detroit 6V71 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 6.9% average improvement on 4 Detroit 6V92 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 0.0% improvement on a Detroit 6V71 engine via CO testing 5.3% average improvement on 4 Detroit 6V92 engines via CO testing 0.8% improvement on a Detroit 6V71 engine via CO2 testing -2.8% average improvement on 4 Detroit 6V92 engines via CO2 testing 52.6% improvement on a Detroit 6V71 engine via HC testing 0.7% average improvement on 4 Detroit 6V92 engines via HC testing 33.0% improvement on a Detroit 6V71 engine via Smoke Spot testing 14.5% average improvement on 4 Detroit 6V92 engines via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 19 of 165
| Test Id: | 42 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Boral |
| File Size: | 0.119 MB |
| Industries: | Mining |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 1-May-1998 |
| Test Date: | 11-May-1998 |
| Test Location: | Western Australia, Australia |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 9.5% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 777C engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing |
Result 20 of 165
| Test Id: | 82 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Brambles Trucking |
| File Size: | 0.488 MB |
| Industries: | Trucking |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 13-Feb-1992 |
| Test Date: | 14-Nov-1991 |
| Test Location: | Western Australia, Australia |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 6.1% average improvement on 12 Volvo F12 Road Trian engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 8.6% average improvement on 6 Volvo F12 Road Trian engines via Statistical testing Engine Emissions Results: 0.3% average improvement on 12 Volvo F12 Road Trian engines via CO testing 8.4% average improvement on 12 Volvo F12 Road Trian engines via CO2 testing 23.5% average improvement on 11 Volvo F12 Road Trian engines via HC testing 20.8% average improvement on 12 Volvo F12 Road Trian engines via Smoke Spot testing |
| Show previous 10 documents | Show all documents on one page | Show next 10 documents |