Test Results Matching your Search
Click here to start another test report search.
There are 64 documents that match your query. These 64 documents contain a total of 946 individual tests. The documents are listed below. You can click the title of the report to bring up a PDF version of the report in a new browser window. You will need Adobe Acrobat Reader to view the documents.
Executive Summary for Document Search
This search included results from:
- 23 locations
- 1 industry
- 2 different fuel types
- 21 different engine manufacturers
- 68 different engine types
- 8 different test procedures
The aggregate results for the tests in this search criteria show:
- 30 Specific Fuel Consumption tests were performed with an average improvement of 5.614%
- 268 Carbon Mass Balance tests were performed with an average improvement of 7.348%
- 23 Statistical tests were performed with an average improvement of 9.157%
- 79 Smoke Spot tests were performed with an average improvement of 21.124%
- 1 NOx tests were performed with an average improvement of -2.000%
- 169 CO tests were performed with an average improvement of 9.296%
- 167 HC tests were performed with an average improvement of 1.855%
- 209 CO2 tests were performed with an average improvement of 8.086%
Result 11 of 64
| Test Id: | 89 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Coca-Cola Bottling |
| File Size: | 18.379 MB |
| Industries: | Trucking |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 11-Oct-1994 |
| Test Date: | 11-Jul-1994 |
| Test Location: | Texas, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 6.4% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3406-B engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 8.7% average improvement on 7 Cummins NTC-300 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 8.0% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3406-B engines via CO testing 18.8% average improvement on 7 Cummins NTC-300 engines via CO testing 0.9% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3406-B engines via CO2 testing 8.0% average improvement on 7 Cummins NTC-300 engines via CO2 testing 17.4% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3406-B engines via HC testing -2.2% average improvement on 7 Cummins NTC-300 engines via HC testing 0.0% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3406-B engines via Smoke Spot testing 14.8% average improvement on 7 Cummins NTC-300 engines via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 12 of 64
| Test Id: | 162 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Commercial Carrier Corporation 
|
| File Size: | 3.342 MB |
| Industries: | Trucking |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 26-Sep-1990 |
| Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
| Test Location: | Florida, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 6.8% average improvement on 10 Mack 300 engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing Engine Emissions Results: 31.7% average improvement on 5 Mack 300 engines via CO testing 8.6% average improvement on 5 Mack 300 engines via HC testing |
Result 13 of 64
| Test Id: | 200 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Commercial Carrier Corporation Testimonials |
| File Size: | 1.697 MB |
| Industries: | Trucking |
| Report Type: | Testimonial |
| Benefits: | Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 26-Sep-1990 |
| Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
| Test Location: | Not Given in Report |
| Summary: | No summary available. Please download the full report by clicking the link in the Title section above. |
Result 14 of 64
| Test Id: | 90 |
|---|---|
| Title: | David A. Tesone Enterprises
|
| File Size: | 8.680 MB |
| Industries: | Trucking |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Carbon in engine, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 13-Jun-1987 |
| Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
| Test Location: | Pennsylvania, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 5.8% average improvement on 6 Mack 285 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 4.4% improvement on a Mack 350 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 20.0% average improvement on 6 Mack 285 engines via CO testing 25.0% improvement on a Mack 350 engine via CO testing 4.8% average improvement on 6 Mack 285 engines via CO2 testing 0.1% improvement on a Mack 350 engine via CO2 testing -38.4% average improvement on 6 Mack 285 engines via HC testing -35.8% improvement on a Mack 350 engine via HC testing |
Result 15 of 64
| Test Id: | 175 |
|---|---|
| Title: | David Tesone Trucking |
| File Size: | 0.623 MB |
| Industries: | Trucking |
| Report Type: | Testimonial |
| Benefits: | Carbon in engine, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 21-Jun-1989 |
| Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
| Test Location: | Not Given in Report |
| Summary: | No summary available. Please download the full report by clicking the link in the Title section above. |
Result 16 of 64
| Test Id: | 91 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Deep South Trucking |
| File Size: | 4.212 MB |
| Industries: | Trucking |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 22-Jul-1992 |
| Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
| Test Location: | Alabama, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: -5.8% improvement on a Caterpillar 310 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 13.5% average improvement on 4 Caterpillar 350 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 29.7% improvement on a Caterpillar 350 engine via CO testing 5.3% improvement on a Caterpillar 350 engine via HC testing |
Result 17 of 64
| Test Id: | 92 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Distribution Trucking Company |
| File Size: | 9.884 MB |
| Industries: | Trucking |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 12-Jan-1994 |
| Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
| Test Location: | Oregon, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 9.8% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3406-B engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing 11.5% improvement on a Cummins NT-14 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 7.7% improvement on a Cummins NTC-400 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing 5.1% average improvement on 4 Detroit 60 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 12.5% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3406-B engines via CO testing 15.0% improvement on a Cummins NT-14 engine via CO testing 14.0% improvement on a Cummins NTC-400 engine via CO testing -5.1% average improvement on 4 Detroit 60 engines via CO testing 9.6% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3406-B engines via CO2 testing 7.8% improvement on a Cummins NT-14 engine via CO2 testing 9.9% improvement on a Cummins NTC-400 engine via CO2 testing 7.7% average improvement on 4 Detroit 60 engines via CO2 testing 13.8% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3406-B engines via HC testing -8.6% improvement on a Cummins NT-14 engine via HC testing 18.5% improvement on a Cummins NTC-400 engine via HC testing 7.8% average improvement on 4 Detroit 60 engines via HC testing 17.0% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3406-B engines via Smoke Spot testing 17.6% improvement on a Cummins NT-14 engine via Smoke Spot testing 11.1% improvement on a Cummins NTC-400 engine via Smoke Spot testing 11.9% average improvement on 4 Detroit 60 engines via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 18 of 64
| Test Id: | 93 |
|---|---|
| Title: | EG&G Idaho |
| File Size: | 7.940 MB |
| Industries: | Trucking |
| Report Type: | Field Test |
| Benefits: | Emissions, Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 12-Aug-1993 |
| Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
| Test Location: | Idaho, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 9.7% average improvement on 8 Detroit 6V92 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing Engine Emissions Results: 12.5% average improvement on 8 Detroit 6V92 engines via CO testing 15.9% average improvement on 8 Detroit 6V92 engines via CO2 testing -1.7% average improvement on 8 Detroit 6V92 engines via HC testing 43.0% average improvement on 8 Detroit 6V92 engines via Smoke Spot testing |
Result 19 of 64
| Test Id: | 201 |
|---|---|
| Title: | FPC letter Testimonial |
| File Size: | 0.007 MB |
| Industries: | Trucking |
| Report Type: | Testimonial |
| Benefits: | Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel), Gasoline |
| Report Date: | 15-Mar-2007 |
| Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
| Test Location: | Tennessee, USA |
| Summary: | No summary available. Please download the full report by clicking the link in the Title section above. |
Result 20 of 64
| Test Id: | 189 |
|---|---|
| Title: | Fraley-Schilling |
| File Size: | 0.646 MB |
| Industries: | Trucking |
| Report Type: | Testimonial |
| Benefits: | Fuel economy |
| Fuels: | 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel) |
| Report Date: | 5-Apr-2007 |
| Test Date: | Not Given in Report |
| Test Location: | Ohio, USA |
| Summary: | Fuel Economy Results: 6.9% average improvement on 2 engines via Statistical testing |
| Show previous 10 documents | Show all documents on one page | Show next 10 documents |