FPC

Test Results Matching your Search

Click here to start another test report search.

There are 76 documents that match your query. These 76 documents contain a total of 1,820 individual test. The documents are listed below. You can click the title of the report to bring up a PDF version of the report in a new browser window. You will need Adobe Acrobat Reader to view the documents.

Executive Summary for Document Search

This search included results from:

The aggregate results for the tests in this search criteria show:

Result 1 of 76

Test Id: 8
Title: A.T. Massey, Sprouse Creek Mine
File Size: 33.744 MB
Industries: Mining, Railroad
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 21-Jul-1994
Test Date: 17-Apr-1994
Test Location: West Virginia, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
7.8% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3412 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
10.4% average improvement on 3 EMD 567 D3 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
4.4% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3412 engines via CO testing
-1.2% average improvement on 3 EMD 567 D3 engines via CO testing
11.5% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3412 engines via CO2 testing
11.8% average improvement on 3 EMD 567 D3 engines via CO2 testing
29.3% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3412 engines via HC testing
91.4% average improvement on 3 EMD 567 D3 engines via HC testing
22.0% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3412 engines via Smoke Spot testing
57.7% average improvement on 3 EMD 567 D3 engines via Smoke Spot testing

Result 2 of 76

Test Id: 69
Title: Alaska Railroad Corporation
File Size: 72.735 MB
Industries: Railroad
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Carbon in engine, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear, Wayside fires
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 10-Nov-1995
Test Date: 16-Sep-1995
Test Location: Alaska, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
9.1% average improvement on 12 EMD 645E engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
-5.8% average improvement on 12 EMD 645E engines via CO testing
5.1% average improvement on 12 EMD 645E engines via CO2 testing
-13.9% average improvement on 12 EMD 645E engines via HC testing
24.3% average improvement on 5 EMD 645E engines via Smoke Spot testing

Result 3 of 76

Test Id: 78
Title: Andhra Pradesh
File Size: 9.721 MB
Industries: Buses
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 30-Oct-1994
Test Date: 28-Oct-1994
Test Location: Andhra Pradesh, India
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
7.7% improvement on a Hino WD6 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
9.9% improvement on a Leyland 370 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
0.2% improvement on a Hino WD6 engine via CO testing
9.9% improvement on a Leyland 370 engine via CO testing
10.2% improvement on a Hino WD6 engine via CO2 testing
18.0% improvement on a Leyland 370 engine via CO2 testing
7.7% improvement on a Hino WD6 engine via HC testing
0.0% average improvement on 2 Hino WD6 engines via Smoke Spot testing
50.0% improvement on a Leyland 370 engine via Smoke Spot testing
50.0% improvement on a Leyland 6-65 engine via Smoke Spot testing

Result 4 of 76

Test Id: 70
Title: Armco Steel
File Size: 16.072 MB
Industries: Railroad
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 30-Jul-1985
Test Date: 20-Feb-1985
Test Location: Pennsylvania, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
12.7% improvement on a EMD 645E engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
21.5% improvement on a EMD 645E engine via CO testing
8.9% improvement on a EMD 645E engine via CO2 testing
41.7% improvement on a EMD 645E engine via HC testing

Result 5 of 76

Test Id: 79
Title: BEC-allwaste
File Size: 22.693 MB
Industries: Trucking
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 15-Sep-1996
Test Date: 10-Jul-1996
Test Location: Alabama, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
6.3% improvement on a Caterpillar 3114 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
10.3% improvement on a Caterpillar 3406 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
14.8% improvement on a Caterpillar 3406-B engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
12.2% improvement on a Cummins 400 Turbo engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
14.5% improvement on a Cummins 5.9 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
-0.8% improvement on a Caterpillar 3114 engine via CO testing
0.2% improvement on a Caterpillar 3406 engine via CO testing
-3.4% improvement on a Caterpillar 3406-B engine via CO testing
17.1% improvement on a Cummins 400 engine via CO testing
-1.7% improvement on a Cummins 5.9 engine via CO testing
13.2% improvement on a Caterpillar 3114 engine via CO2 testing
14.4% improvement on a Caterpillar 3406 engine via CO2 testing
11.8% improvement on a Caterpillar 3406-B engine via CO2 testing
10.5% improvement on a Cummins 400 engine via CO2 testing
9.5% improvement on a Cummins 5.9 engine via CO2 testing
14.1% improvement on a Caterpillar 3114 engine via HC testing
42.4% improvement on a Caterpillar 3406 engine via HC testing
29.3% improvement on a Caterpillar 3406-B engine via HC testing
19.1% improvement on a Cummins 400 engine via HC testing
29.1% improvement on a Cummins 5.9 engine via HC testing
36.4% improvement on a Caterpillar 3114 engine via Smoke Spot testing
25.0% improvement on a Caterpillar 3406 engine via Smoke Spot testing
14.3% improvement on a Caterpillar 3406-B engine via Smoke Spot testing
0.0% improvement on a Cummins 400 Turbo engine via Smoke Spot testing
20.0% improvement on a Cummins 5.9 engine via Smoke Spot testing

Result 6 of 76

Test Id: 14
Title: Bellevue Gold Mine Power Station
File Size: 13.352 MB
Industries: Generators
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 1-Dec-1992
Test Date: 25-Oct-1992
Test Location: Western Australia, Australia
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
1.0% improvement on a Cummins KTA38 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
7.1% average improvement on 3 Cummins KTA50 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
-2.2% improvement on a Cummins KTA38 engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing
2.3% average improvement on 9 Cummins KTA50 engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing
Engine Emissions Results:
-4.4% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTA38 engines via CO testing
-45.7% average improvement on 6 Cummins KTA50 engines via CO testing
-10.2% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTA38 engines via CO2 testing
7.5% average improvement on 6 Cummins KTA50 engines via CO2 testing
100.0% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTA38 engines via HC testing
38.0% average improvement on 6 Cummins KTA50 engines via HC testing
38.5% improvement on a Cummins KTA38 engine via Smoke Spot testing
0.0% improvement on a Cummins KTA50 engine via Smoke Spot testing

Result 7 of 76

Test Id: 80
Title: BFI Holding
File Size: 16.594 MB
Industries: Trucking
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 18-Nov-1994
Test Date: 7-Sep-1994
Test Location: Duiven, Netherlands
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
10.1% average improvement on 3 DAF 2300 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
-3.5% improvement on a DAF 2500 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
6.7% improvement on a DAF 65 180 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
13.4% improvement on a DAF 75 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
5.6% average improvement on 2 DAF 75S 240 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
7.9% average improvement on 2 DAF 85 330 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
8.8% improvement on a Mercedes 3528 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
3.7% improvement on a Scania 81 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
10.2% improvement on a Scania 93H 280 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
24.7% average improvement on 3 DAF 2300 engines via CO testing
1.6% improvement on a DAF 2500 engine via CO testing
32.8% improvement on a DAF 65 180 engine via CO testing
24.0% improvement on a DAF 75 engine via CO testing
12.9% average improvement on 2 DAF 75S 240 engines via CO testing
19.9% average improvement on 2 DAF 85 330 engines via CO testing
35.4% improvement on a Mercedes 3528 engine via CO testing
26.8% improvement on a Scania 81 engine via CO testing
26.2% improvement on a Sulzer 11,000 SHP engine via CO testing
8.0% average improvement on 3 DAF 2300 engines via CO2 testing
1.9% improvement on a DAF 2500 engine via CO2 testing
12.0% improvement on a DAF 65 180 engine via CO2 testing
9.6% improvement on a DAF 75 engine via CO2 testing
8.6% average improvement on 2 DAF 75S 240 engines via CO2 testing
9.8% average improvement on 2 DAF 85 330 engines via CO2 testing
8.6% improvement on a Mercedes 3528 engine via CO2 testing
-7.0% improvement on a Scania 81 engine via CO2 testing
6.7% improvement on a Scania 93H 280 engine via CO2 testing
1.1% average improvement on 3 DAF 2300 engines via HC testing
23.4% improvement on a DAF 2500 engine via HC testing
-24.9% improvement on a DAF 65 180 engine via HC testing
4.3% improvement on a DAF 75 engine via HC testing
10.9% average improvement on 2 DAF 75S 240 engines via HC testing
0.3% average improvement on 2 DAF 85 330 engines via HC testing
3.0% improvement on a Mercedes 3528 engine via HC testing
0.9% improvement on a Scania 81 engine via HC testing
4.3% improvement on a Scania 93H 280 engine via HC testing
14.1% average improvement on 4 DAF 2300 engines via Smoke Spot testing
12.5% improvement on a DAF 2500 engine via Smoke Spot testing
14.3% improvement on a DAF 65 180 engine via Smoke Spot testing
12.5% improvement on a DAF 75 engine via Smoke Spot testing
-14.3% improvement on a DAF 75S 240 engine via Smoke Spot testing
15.0% average improvement on 2 DAF 85 330 engines via Smoke Spot testing
25.0% improvement on a Mercedes 3528 engine via Smoke Spot testing
45.5% improvement on a Scania 81 engine via Smoke Spot testing
28.6% improvement on a Scania 93H 280 engine via Smoke Spot testing

Result 8 of 76

Test Id: 27
Title: Boise Cascade Corporation
File Size: 12.213 MB
Industries: Trucking
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 10-Aug-1993
Test Date: 3-Aug-1993
Test Location: Idaho, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
13.4% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3306 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
5.2% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3408 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
7.5% average improvement on 2 Perkins In-Line 6 1006-6 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
18.0% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3306 engines via CO testing
9.0% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3408 engines via CO testing
11.9% average improvement on 2 Perkins In-Line 6 1006-6 engines via CO testing
10.0% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3306 engines via CO2 testing
-0.7% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3408 engines via CO2 testing
-0.3% average improvement on 2 Perkins In-Line 6 1006-6 engines via CO2 testing
-6.6% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3306 engines via HC testing
-19.8% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3408 engines via HC testing
-39.5% average improvement on 2 Perkins In-Line 6 1006-6 engines via HC testing

Result 9 of 76

Test Id: 81
Title: Boise Urban Stages
File Size: 6.812 MB
Industries: Buses
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 10-Aug-1993
Test Date: 1-Aug-1993
Test Location: Idaho, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
6.3% improvement on a Detroit 6V71 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
6.9% average improvement on 4 Detroit 6V92 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
0.0% improvement on a Detroit 6V71 engine via CO testing
5.3% average improvement on 4 Detroit 6V92 engines via CO testing
0.8% improvement on a Detroit 6V71 engine via CO2 testing
-2.8% average improvement on 4 Detroit 6V92 engines via CO2 testing
52.6% improvement on a Detroit 6V71 engine via HC testing
0.7% average improvement on 4 Detroit 6V92 engines via HC testing
33.0% improvement on a Detroit 6V71 engine via Smoke Spot testing
14.5% average improvement on 4 Detroit 6V92 engines via Smoke Spot testing

Result 10 of 76

Test Id: 82
Title: Brambles Trucking
File Size: 0.488 MB
Industries: Trucking
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 13-Feb-1992
Test Date: 14-Nov-1991
Test Location: Western Australia, Australia
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
6.1% average improvement on 12 Volvo F12 Road Trian engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
8.6% average improvement on 6 Volvo F12 Road Trian engines via Statistical testing
Engine Emissions Results:
0.3% average improvement on 12 Volvo F12 Road Trian engines via CO testing
8.4% average improvement on 12 Volvo F12 Road Trian engines via CO2 testing
23.5% average improvement on 11 Volvo F12 Road Trian engines via HC testing
20.8% average improvement on 12 Volvo F12 Road Trian engines via Smoke Spot testing

Result 11 of 76

Test Id: 83
Title: Broward County Schools
File Size: 14.875 MB
Industries: Buses
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Carbon in engine, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 4-Apr-1995
Test Date: 28-Oct-1994
Test Location: Florida, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
6.7% average improvement on 3 Cummins B engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
8.7% average improvement on 2 Navistar 444 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
7.0% improvement on a Navistar 7.3 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
8.1% average improvement on 4 Navistar DT 360 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
4.6% average improvement on 4 Cummins B engines via CO testing
21.2% average improvement on 3 Navistar 444 engines via CO testing
19.6% improvement on a Navistar 7.3 engine via CO testing
-9.4% average improvement on 2 Navistar DT 360 engines via CO testing
5.4% average improvement on 3 Cummins B engines via CO2 testing
1.9% average improvement on 2 Navistar 444 engines via CO2 testing
3.8% improvement on a Navistar 7.3 engine via CO2 testing
4.2% average improvement on 4 Navistar DT 360 engines via CO2 testing
-18.2% average improvement on 3 Cummins B engines via HC testing
7.7% average improvement on 2 Navistar 444 engines via HC testing
15.5% improvement on a Navistar 7.3 engine via HC testing
-36.5% average improvement on 4 Navistar DT 360 engines via HC testing
13.3% average improvement on 3 Cummins B engines via Smoke Spot testing
20.0% average improvement on 2 Navistar 444 engines via Smoke Spot testing
25.0% improvement on a Navistar 7.3 engine via Smoke Spot testing
15.3% average improvement on 4 Navistar DT 360 engines via Smoke Spot testing

Result 12 of 76

Test Id: 187
Title: Canadian Pacific Railway St. Lawrence & Hudson Railway
File Size: 26.822 MB
Industries: Railroad
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Carbon in engine, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 1-May-2000
Test Date: Not Given in Report
Test Location: Not Given in Report
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
7.3% average improvement on 3 EMD SD40-2 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
45.6% average improvement on 3 EMD SD40-2 engines via CO testing
5.0% improvement on a EMD SD40-2 engine via CO2 testing
43.8% average improvement on 3 EMD SD40-2 engines via HC testing
5.0% improvement on a EMD SD40-2 engine via NOx testing
11.3% average improvement on 4 EMD SD40-2 engines via Smoke Spot testing

Result 13 of 76

Test Id: 41
Title: Central Norsman
File Size: 0.095 MB
Industries: Generators, Mining
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 1-May-2004
Test Date: 21-Apr-2004
Test Location: Western Australia, Australia
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
3.9% average improvement on 4 Cummins KTA50 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
3.5% average improvement on 4 Cummins KTA50 engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing
Engine Emissions Results:
55.9% average improvement on 4 Cummins KTA50 engines via CO testing
10.8% average improvement on 4 Cummins KTA50 engines via CO2 testing
68.4% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTA50 engines via HC testing
29.0% average improvement on 4 Cummins KTA50 engines via Smoke Spot testing

Result 14 of 76

Test Id: 84
Title: Charley Brothers
File Size: 14.550 MB
Industries: Trucking
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 21-Jul-1989
Test Date: 13-Apr-1989
Test Location: Pennsylvania, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
5.8% average improvement on 14 Mack 300 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
31.8% average improvement on 13 Mack 300 engines via CO testing
1.6% average improvement on 14 Mack 300 engines via CO2 testing
-69.5% average improvement on 13 Mack 300 engines via HC testing
-85.7% improvement on a Navistar 444 engine via HC testing

Result 15 of 76

Test Id: 85
Title: Cheran Transport
File Size: 24.740 MB
Industries: Buses
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 30-Jun-1994
Test Date: 11-Feb-1994
Test Location: Tamil Nadu, India
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
6.5% average improvement on 9 Hino Bus engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
18.9% average improvement on 2 Leyland 6-65 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
3.9% improvement on a Viking BW engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
1.8% average improvement on 5 Hino Bus engines via CO2 testing
12.0% average improvement on 2 Leyland 665 engines via CO2 testing
2.5% improvement on a Viking 370 engine via CO2 testing
-12.6% average improvement on 5 Hino Bus engines via HC testing
20.9% average improvement on 2 Leyland 665 engines via HC testing
10.6% improvement on a Viking 370 engine via HC testing
35.0% average improvement on 4 Hino Bus engines via Smoke Spot testing

Result 16 of 76

Test Id: 161
Title: City of Gatlinburg
File Size: 4.200 MB
Industries: Buses
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 15-Aug-1990
Test Date: Not Given in Report
Test Location: Tennessee, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
6.7% average improvement on 2 Cummins 6BT engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
6.7% improvement on a Detroit 6.2 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
6.7% improvement on a Ford 88 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
6.7% improvement on a Isuzu 6BD engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
-2.4% average improvement on 2 Cummins 6BT engines via CO testing
-2.4% improvement on a Detroit 6.2 engine via CO testing
-2.4% improvement on a Ford 88 engine via CO testing
-2.4% improvement on a Isuzu 6BD engine via CO testing
6.4% average improvement on 2 Cummins 6BT engines via CO2 testing
6.4% improvement on a Detroit 6.2 engine via CO2 testing
6.4% improvement on a Ford 88 engine via CO2 testing
6.4% improvement on a Isuzu 6BD engine via CO2 testing
25.1% average improvement on 2 Cummins 6BT engines via HC testing
25.1% improvement on a Detroit 6.2 engine via HC testing
25.1% improvement on a Ford 88 engine via HC testing
25.1% improvement on a Isuzu 6BD engine via HC testing

Result 17 of 76

Test Id: 88
Title: City of Southaven
File Size: 0.774 MB
Industries: Trucking
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel), Gasoline
Report Date: 28-Dec-1993
Test Date: Not Given in Report
Test Location: Mississippi, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
6.6% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3208 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
12.4% improvement on a Crown Victoria Patrol Car engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
8.1% average improvement on 2 Ford Ambulance engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
12.7% improvement on a Isuzu Pickup engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
-45.6% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3208 engines via CO testing
0.0% average improvement on 2 Crown Victoria Patrol Car engines via CO testing
92.7% average improvement on 2 Isuzu Pickup engines via CO testing
14.2% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3208 engines via CO2 testing
10.1% average improvement on 2 Crown Victoria Patrol Car engines via CO2 testing
7.1% improvement on a Ford Ambulance engine via CO2 testing
-1.1% improvement on a Isuzu Pickup engine via CO2 testing
-21.1% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3208 engines via HC testing
60.1% improvement on a Crown Victoria Patrol Car engine via HC testing
22.4% average improvement on 2 Ford Ambulance engines via HC testing
58.9% improvement on a Isuzu Pickup engine via HC testing

Result 18 of 76

Test Id: 89
Title: Coca-Cola Bottling
File Size: 18.379 MB
Industries: Trucking
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 11-Oct-1994
Test Date: 11-Jul-1994
Test Location: Texas, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
6.4% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3406-B engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
8.7% average improvement on 7 Cummins NTC-300 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
8.0% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3406-B engines via CO testing
18.8% average improvement on 7 Cummins NTC-300 engines via CO testing
0.9% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3406-B engines via CO2 testing
8.0% average improvement on 7 Cummins NTC-300 engines via CO2 testing
17.4% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3406-B engines via HC testing
-2.2% average improvement on 7 Cummins NTC-300 engines via HC testing
0.0% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3406-B engines via Smoke Spot testing
14.8% average improvement on 7 Cummins NTC-300 engines via Smoke Spot testing

Result 19 of 76

Test Id: 12
Title: Cominco Alaska Red Dog Mine Powerhouse
File Size: 73.385 MB
Industries: Generators
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 24-Feb-1995
Test Date: 18-Jan-1995
Test Location: Alaska, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
4.1% average improvement on 3 Wartsila 16V32 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
9.0% average improvement on 3 Wartsila 16V32 engines via CO testing
3.7% average improvement on 3 Wartsila 16V32 engines via CO2 testing
13.6% average improvement on 3 Wartsila 16V32 engines via HC testing
20.0% improvement on a Wartsila 16V32 engine via Smoke Spot testing

Result 20 of 76

Test Id: 17
Title: Customer Trial Evaluation Maritrans
File Size: 5.262 MB
Industries: Marine
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 26-Nov-1987
Test Date: 1-Sep-1987
Test Location: Pennsylvania, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
5.5% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 399 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
4.0% improvement on a EMD 567BC engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
8.2% improvement on a EMD 645E engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
3.6% improvement on a Caterpillar 399 engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing
5.7% improvement on a EMD 567BC engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing
5.0% improvement on a EMD 645E engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing
Engine Emissions Results:
21.7% improvement on a Caterpillar 399 engine via CO testing
5.4% improvement on a EMD 567BC engine via CO testing
45.5% improvement on a EMD 645E engine via CO testing
5.0% improvement on a Caterpillar 399 engine via CO2 testing
17.9% improvement on a EMD 567BC engine via CO2 testing
11.9% improvement on a EMD 645E engine via CO2 testing
6.7% improvement on a Caterpillar 399 engine via HC testing
-34.3% improvement on a EMD 567BC engine via HC testing
7.1% improvement on a EMD 645E engine via HC testing

Result 21 of 76

Test Id: 90
Title: David A. Tesone Enterprises
File Size: 8.680 MB
Industries: Trucking
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Carbon in engine, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 13-Jun-1987
Test Date: Not Given in Report
Test Location: Pennsylvania, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
5.8% average improvement on 6 Mack 285 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
4.4% improvement on a Mack 350 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
20.0% average improvement on 6 Mack 285 engines via CO testing
25.0% improvement on a Mack 350 engine via CO testing
4.8% average improvement on 6 Mack 285 engines via CO2 testing
0.1% improvement on a Mack 350 engine via CO2 testing
-38.4% average improvement on 6 Mack 285 engines via HC testing
-35.8% improvement on a Mack 350 engine via HC testing

Result 22 of 76

Test Id: 18
Title: Devall Diesel
File Size: 5.236 MB
Industries: Marine
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Biocide, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 1-Aug-2000
Test Date: 5-Jun-2000
Test Location: Louisiana, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
10.4% improvement on a Detroit 16V92 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
55.2% improvement on a Detroit 16V92 engine via CO testing
22.0% improvement on a Detroit 16V92 engine via CO2 testing
-28.0% improvement on a Detroit 16V92 engine via HC testing
31.0% improvement on a Detroit 16V92 engine via Smoke Spot testing

Result 23 of 76

Test Id: 92
Title: Distribution Trucking Company
File Size: 9.884 MB
Industries: Trucking
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 12-Jan-1994
Test Date: Not Given in Report
Test Location: Oregon, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
9.8% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3406-B engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
11.5% improvement on a Cummins NT-14 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
7.7% improvement on a Cummins NTC-400 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
5.1% average improvement on 4 Detroit 60 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
12.5% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3406-B engines via CO testing
15.0% improvement on a Cummins NT-14 engine via CO testing
14.0% improvement on a Cummins NTC-400 engine via CO testing
-5.1% average improvement on 4 Detroit 60 engines via CO testing
9.6% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3406-B engines via CO2 testing
7.8% improvement on a Cummins NT-14 engine via CO2 testing
9.9% improvement on a Cummins NTC-400 engine via CO2 testing
7.7% average improvement on 4 Detroit 60 engines via CO2 testing
13.8% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3406-B engines via HC testing
-8.6% improvement on a Cummins NT-14 engine via HC testing
18.5% improvement on a Cummins NTC-400 engine via HC testing
7.8% average improvement on 4 Detroit 60 engines via HC testing
17.0% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3406-B engines via Smoke Spot testing
17.6% improvement on a Cummins NT-14 engine via Smoke Spot testing
11.1% improvement on a Cummins NTC-400 engine via Smoke Spot testing
11.9% average improvement on 4 Detroit 60 engines via Smoke Spot testing

Result 24 of 76

Test Id: 44
Title: Dominion Mining
File Size: 12.589 MB
Industries: Generators, Mining
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 27-May-1994
Test Date: 30-Mar-1994
Test Location: Western Australia, Australia
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
3.6% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTA50 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
3.3% average improvement on 3 Cummins KTA50 engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing
Engine Emissions Results:
8.4% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTA50 engines via CO testing
6.4% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTA50 engines via CO2 testing
2.7% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTA50 engines via Smoke Spot testing

Result 25 of 76

Test Id: 211
Title: Echo Bay Mining
File Size: 22.349 MB
Industries: Mining
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 23-Nov-1994
Test Date: 29-Mar-1994
Test Location: Nevada, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
8.2% average improvement on 6 Caterpillar 3512 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
6.8% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTA 38C engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
4.8% average improvement on 3 MTU 16V396 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
-7.0% average improvement on 5 Caterpillar 3512 engines via CO testing
100.0% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTA 38C engines via CO testing
4.4% average improvement on 3 MTU 16V396 engines via CO testing
12.9% average improvement on 6 Caterpillar 3512 engines via CO2 testing
6.7% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTA 38C engines via CO2 testing
5.0% average improvement on 3 MTU 16V396 engines via CO2 testing
16.8% average improvement on 6 Caterpillar 3512 engines via HC testing
28.9% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTA 38C engines via HC testing
33.5% average improvement on 3 MTU 16V396 engines via HC testing
19.3% average improvement on 5 Caterpillar 3512 engines via Smoke Spot testing
28.1% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTA 38C engines via Smoke Spot testing
9.4% average improvement on 3 MTU 16V396 engines via Smoke Spot testing

Result 26 of 76

Test Id: 93
Title: EG&G Idaho
File Size: 7.940 MB
Industries: Trucking
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 12-Aug-1993
Test Date: Not Given in Report
Test Location: Idaho, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
9.7% average improvement on 8 Detroit 6V92 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
12.5% average improvement on 8 Detroit 6V92 engines via CO testing
15.9% average improvement on 8 Detroit 6V92 engines via CO2 testing
-1.7% average improvement on 8 Detroit 6V92 engines via HC testing
43.0% average improvement on 8 Detroit 6V92 engines via Smoke Spot testing

Result 27 of 76

Test Id: 94
Title: FMC, Dry Valley Mine
File Size: 3.820 MB
Industries: Mining
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 2-Aug-1993
Test Date: Not Given in Report
Test Location: Idaho, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
12.2% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3512 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
12.6% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3512 engines via CO testing
11.4% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3512 engines via CO2 testing
28.7% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3512 engines via HC testing
16.3% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3512 engines via Smoke Spot testing

Result 28 of 76

Test Id: 95
Title: FMC, Skull Point Field Trial
File Size: 28.206 MB
Industries: Mining
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 26-Jun-1994
Test Date: 21-Jul-1994
Test Location: Wyoming, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
7.6% improvement on a Caterpillar 3408 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
7.9% improvement on a Caterpillar 3412 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
6.2% improvement on a Caterpillar 3512 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
11.4% improvement on a Cummins 350 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
10.0% improvement on a Cummins KTA19C engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
0.6% improvement on a Caterpillar 3408 engine via CO testing
6.2% improvement on a Caterpillar 3412 engine via CO testing
10.0% improvement on a Caterpillar 3512 engine via CO testing
65.1% improvement on a Cummins 350 engine via CO testing
-0.6% improvement on a Cummins KTA19C engine via CO testing
6.6% improvement on a Caterpillar 3408 engine via CO2 testing
6.7% improvement on a Caterpillar 3412 engine via CO2 testing
2.4% improvement on a Caterpillar 3512 engine via CO2 testing
11.4% improvement on a Cummins 350 engine via CO2 testing
14.0% improvement on a Cummins KTA19C engine via CO2 testing
64.2% improvement on a Caterpillar 3408 engine via HC testing
19.9% improvement on a Caterpillar 3512 engine via HC testing
4.8% improvement on a Cummins KTA19C engine via HC testing

Result 29 of 76

Test Id: 120
Title: Gainsville
File Size: 0.028 MB
Industries: Trucking
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 20-Aug-1990
Test Date: Not Given in Report
Test Location: Florida, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
7.4% improvement on a Detroit 6V92 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
27.3% improvement on a Detroit 6V92 engine via CO testing
6.8% improvement on a Detroit 6V92 engine via CO2 testing
41.5% improvement on a Detroit 6V92 engine via HC testing

Result 30 of 76

Test Id: 72
Title: Geneva Steel
File Size: 7.723 MB
Industries: Railroad
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 22-Feb-1999
Test Date: 12-Apr-1997
Test Location: Utah, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
5.5% average improvement on 2 EMD SW1200 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
10.1% average improvement on 2 EMD SW1500 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
8.3% average improvement on 2 EMD SW1200 engines via CO testing
-8.1% improvement on a EMD SW1500 engine via CO testing
7.2% average improvement on 2 EMD SW1200 engines via CO2 testing
19.1% average improvement on 2 EMD SW1500 engines via CO2 testing
89.3% average improvement on 2 EMD SW1200 engines via HC testing
22.5% average improvement on 2 EMD SW1500 engines via HC testing
11.2% average improvement on 2 EMD SW1200 engines via Smoke Spot testing
17.7% average improvement on 2 EMD SW1500 engines via Smoke Spot testing

Result 31 of 76

Test Id: 96
Title: Golden Gem Growers
File Size: 9.576 MB
Industries: Trucking
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 1-Feb-1991
Test Date: Not Given in Report
Test Location: Florida, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
7.1% improvement on a Mack 237 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
7.1% improvement on a Mack 237 engine via CO2 testing
42.5% improvement on a Mack 237 engine via HC testing

Result 32 of 76

Test Id: 154
Title: Greyhound Lines , INC
File Size: 34.897 MB
Industries: Buses
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: Not Given in Report
Test Date: 1-Jan-1983
Test Location: Arizona, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
9.7% improvement on a 4900 Bus engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
14.1% improvement on a 6600 Bus engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
100.0% improvement on a 4900 Bus engine via CO testing
100.0% improvement on a 6600 Bus engine via CO testing
9.1% improvement on a 4900 Bus engine via CO2 testing
9.6% improvement on a 6600 Bus engine via CO2 testing
92.2% improvement on a 4900 Bus engine via HC testing
88.8% improvement on a 6600 Bus engine via HC testing

Result 33 of 76

Test Id: 137
Title: Greyhound Lines, Florida
File Size: 6.244 MB
Industries: Buses
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 20-Jan-1986
Test Date: 1-Jan-1983
Test Location: Florida, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
9.7% improvement on a Detroit 8V-71 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
5.6% improvement on a Detroit 8V-71 engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing
Engine Emissions Results:
92.0% improvement on a Detroit 8V-71 engine via CO testing
9.0% improvement on a Detroit 8V-71 engine via CO2 testing
94.0% improvement on a Detroit V871 engine via HC testing

Result 34 of 76

Test Id: 98
Title: Gujarat
File Size: 21.654 MB
Industries: Buses
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 30-Jun-1994
Test Date: 11-Feb-1992
Test Location: Gujarat, India
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
5.9% average improvement on 5 Hino Bus engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
12.4% improvement on a Leyland 665 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
3.9% improvement on a Viking 370 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
2.3% average improvement on 5 Hino Bus engines via CO2 testing
6.7% improvement on a Leyland 665 engine via CO2 testing
-0.8% improvement on a Viking 370 engine via CO2 testing
-4.8% average improvement on 5 Hino Bus engines via HC testing
17.3% improvement on a Leyland 665 engine via HC testing
10.6% improvement on a Viking 370 engine via HC testing
22.5% average improvement on 4 Hino Bus engines via Smoke Spot testing
33.0% improvement on a Leyland 665 engine via Smoke Spot testing
43.0% improvement on a Viking 370 engine via Smoke Spot testing

Result 35 of 76

Test Id: 99
Title: Hillsborough County School
File Size: 46.021 MB
Industries: Buses
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 11-Aug-1994
Test Date: 5-Apr-1994
Test Location: Florida, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
3.8% average improvement on 2 International 6.9 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
4.5% average improvement on 2 International 9.0 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
6.3% average improvement on 2 International DT466 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
13.9% average improvement on 2 International 6.9 engines via CO testing
20.9% average improvement on 2 International 9.0 engines via CO testing
16.4% average improvement on 2 International DT466 engines via CO testing
5.5% average improvement on 2 International 6.9 engines via CO2 testing
4.5% average improvement on 2 International 9.0 engines via CO2 testing
6.0% average improvement on 2 International DT466 engines via CO2 testing
10.3% average improvement on 2 International 6.9 engines via HC testing
-22.4% average improvement on 2 International 9.0 engines via HC testing
11.6% average improvement on 2 International DT466 engines via HC testing
17.0% average improvement on 2 International 6.9 engines via Smoke Spot testing
41.0% average improvement on 2 International 9.0 engines via Smoke Spot testing
0.0% improvement on a International DT466 engine via Smoke Spot testing

Result 36 of 76

Test Id: 73
Title: Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad
File Size: 15.412 MB
Industries: Railroad
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 15-Sep-1997
Test Date: 4-Aug-1997
Test Location: Indiana, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
9.6% average improvement on 3 EMD GP38-2 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
7.2% average improvement on 3 EMD SD40 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
8.6% average improvement on 3 EMD SW1500 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
0.3% average improvement on 3 EMD GP38-2 engines via CO testing
59.1% average improvement on 3 EMD SD40 engines via CO testing
-18.6% average improvement on 3 EMD SW1500 engines via CO testing
9.7% average improvement on 3 EMD GP38-2 engines via CO2 testing
6.1% average improvement on 3 EMD SD40 engines via CO2 testing
6.3% average improvement on 3 EMD SW1500 engines via CO2 testing
34.5% average improvement on 3 EMD GP38-2 engines via HC testing
53.1% average improvement on 3 EMD SD40 engines via HC testing
50.1% average improvement on 3 EMD SW1500 engines via HC testing

Result 37 of 76

Test Id: 164
Title: Industrial Waste Services
File Size: 3.543 MB
Industries: Trucking
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 20-Jul-1990
Test Date: Not Given in Report
Test Location: Florida, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
8.2% average improvement on 5 Mack 300 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
8.2% improvement on a Mack 672 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
19.0% average improvement on 5 Mack 300 engines via CO testing
19.0% improvement on a Mack 672 engine via CO testing
7.6% average improvement on 5 Mack 300 engines via CO2 testing
7.6% improvement on a Mack 672 engine via CO2 testing
29.2% average improvement on 5 Mack 300 engines via HC testing
29.2% improvement on a Mack 672 engine via HC testing

Result 38 of 76

Test Id: 24
Title: Interlink Express
File Size: 9.470 MB
Industries: Trucking
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 14-Dec-1995
Test Date: 19-Jul-1995
Test Location: England, England
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
2.5% improvement on a Mer 1820 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
2.5% improvement on a Mer 1834 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
-47.7% improvement on a Mer 1820 engine via CO testing
-16.8% improvement on a Mer 1834 engine via CO testing
8.1% improvement on a Mer 1820 engine via CO2 testing
6.5% improvement on a Mer 1834 engine via CO2 testing
17.8% improvement on a Mer 1820 engine via HC testing
-1.1% improvement on a Mer 1834 engine via HC testing
23.0% improvement on a Mer 1820 engine via Smoke Spot testing
23.0% improvement on a Mer 1834 engine via Smoke Spot testing

Result 39 of 76

Test Id: 100
Title: J.R.C. Enterprises
File Size: 7.130 MB
Industries: Buses
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 1D Diesel (Kerosene), 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 1-Sep-1983
Test Date: 1-Jul-1983
Test Location: Arizona, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
3.5% average improvement on 2 Detroit 6V92 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
3.5% improvement on a Detroit 8V-71 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
3.5% improvement on a Man 7011 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
3.5% improvement on a Man 7020 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
100.0% improvement on a Man 7020 engine via CO testing
9.3% improvement on a Man 7020 engine via CO2 testing
41.2% improvement on a Man 7020 engine via HC testing

Result 40 of 76

Test Id: 101
Title: JBP Companies
File Size: 0.424 MB
Industries: Trucking
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 22-Apr-1992
Test Date: 20-Jan-1992
Test Location: Utah, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
7.5% average improvement on 4 Cummins L-10 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
-18.7% average improvement on 6 Cummins L-10 engines via CO testing
-2.7% average improvement on 6 Cummins L-10 engines via CO2 testing
0.2% average improvement on 6 Cummins L-10 engines via HC testing

Result 41 of 76

Test Id: 142
Title: Jelco Buses
File Size: 10.387 MB
Industries: Buses
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Carbon in engine, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 28-Mar-1988
Test Date: 21-Jan-1988
Test Location: Wisconsin, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
6.1% improvement on a Isuzu 6BD-1 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
6.7% improvement on a Isuzu 6BD-1 engine via CO testing
6.7% improvement on a Isuzu 6BD-1 engine via CO2 testing
-19.1% improvement on a Isuzu 6BD-1 engine via HC testing

Result 42 of 76

Test Id: 49
Title: Kennecott Copper
File Size: 26.441 MB
Industries: Mining
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 12-Apr-1995
Test Date: 27-Feb-1995
Test Location: Utah, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
9.5% average improvement on 4 Caterpillar 3516 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
4.7% improvement on a Caterpillar 3612 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
7.2% average improvement on 4 Caterpillar 3516 engines via CO testing
-7.3% improvement on a Caterpillar 3612 engine via CO testing
6.8% average improvement on 4 Caterpillar 3516 engines via CO2 testing
3.7% improvement on a Caterpillar 3612 engine via CO2 testing
5.1% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3516 engines via HC testing
24.4% improvement on a Caterpillar 3612 engine via HC testing
12.2% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3516 engines via Smoke Spot testing
6.7% improvement on a Caterpillar 3612 engine via Smoke Spot testing

Result 43 of 76

Test Id: 103
Title: Knoxville Transportation
File Size: 7.635 MB
Industries: Trucking
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 20-Jun-1985
Test Date: 12-Nov-1984
Test Location: Tennessee, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
10.5% improvement on a Detroit 6V92 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
16.9% improvement on a Detroit 6V92 engine via CO2 testing

Result 44 of 76

Test Id: 104
Title: Laidlaw Bus
File Size: 13.087 MB
Industries: Buses
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 23-May-1996
Test Date: 27-Mar-1996
Test Location: Wisconsin, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
12.3% improvement on a Detroit 8.2 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
6.3% improvement on a GM 6.2 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
9.9% average improvement on 2 Int'l 7.3 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
11.4% improvement on a Int'l DTA 360 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
13.2% average improvement on 2 International DT466 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
35.7% improvement on a Detroit 8.2 engine via CO testing
42.5% improvement on a GM 6.2 engine via CO testing
8.4% average improvement on 2 Int'l 7.3 engines via CO testing
23.0% improvement on a Int'l DTA 360 engine via CO testing
15.4% average improvement on 2 International DT466 engines via CO testing
5.9% improvement on a Detroit 8.2 engine via CO2 testing
5.1% improvement on a GM 6.2 engine via CO2 testing
7.3% average improvement on 2 Int'l 7.3 engines via CO2 testing
6.2% improvement on a Int'l DTA 360 engine via CO2 testing
8.7% average improvement on 2 International DT466 engines via CO2 testing
-1.7% improvement on a Detroit 8.2 engine via HC testing
30.6% improvement on a GM 6.2 engine via HC testing
-0.2% average improvement on 2 Int'l 7.3 engines via HC testing
18.9% improvement on a Int'l DTA 360 engine via HC testing
7.3% average improvement on 2 International DT466 engines via HC testing
43.0% improvement on a Detroit 8.2 engine via Smoke Spot testing
50.0% improvement on a GM 6.2 engine via Smoke Spot testing
40.0% average improvement on 2 Int'l 7.3 engines via Smoke Spot testing
45.0% improvement on a Int'l DTA 360 engine via Smoke Spot testing
50.0% average improvement on 2 International DT466 engines via Smoke Spot testing

Result 45 of 76

Test Id: 105
Title: Lusk
File Size: 21.380 MB
Industries: Trucking
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 21-Jul-1994
Test Date: 20-Apr-1994
Test Location: West Virginia, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
14.6% improvement on a Cummins 315 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
11.4% average improvement on 2 Mack 300 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
7.3% improvement on a Cummins 315 engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing
4.4% average improvement on 2 Mack 300 engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing
Engine Emissions Results:
8.9% improvement on a Cummins 315 engine via CO testing
8.0% average improvement on 2 Mack 300 engines via CO testing
15.4% improvement on a Cummins 315 engine via CO2 testing
11.9% average improvement on 2 Mack 300 engines via CO2 testing
-46.0% improvement on a Cummins 315 engine via HC testing
20.3% average improvement on 2 Mack 300 engines via HC testing
37.0% improvement on a Cummins 315 engine via Smoke Spot testing
56.0% average improvement on 2 Mack 300 engines via Smoke Spot testing

Result 46 of 76

Test Id: 68
Title: M.S.Conus
File Size: 3.148 MB
Industries: Boiler, Marine
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Carbon in engine, Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels: 4D Diesel (Bunker C, Heavy Fuel Oil, 380 centistoke)
Report Date: 1-Aug-1985
Test Date: 1-Sep-1984
Test Location: Eastern Australia, Australia
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
0.9% average improvement on 2 Sulzer 6RND 68M engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing
Engine Emissions Results:
12.7% average improvement on 3 Boiler engines via CO testing
3.6% average improvement on 3 Boiler engines via CO2 testing
35.6% average improvement on 3 Boiler engines via HC testing
1.8% average improvement on 3 Boiler engines via NOx testing

Result 47 of 76

Test Id: 51
Title: Magma Copper
File Size: 21.964 MB
Industries: Mining
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 18-May-1994
Test Date: 14-Apr-1994
Test Location: Arizona, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
7.7% average improvement on 6 Detroit 16V149 DT engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
12.5% average improvement on 6 Detroit 16V149 DT engines via CO testing
8.5% average improvement on 6 Detroit 16V149 DT engines via CO2 testing
12.7% average improvement on 6 Detroit 16V149 DT engines via HC testing
21.1% average improvement on 7 Detroit 16V149 DT engines via Smoke Spot testing

Result 48 of 76

Test Id: 107
Title: Memphis Cablevision
File Size: 0.655 MB
Industries: Trucking
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 27-Dec-1993
Test Date: Not Given in Report
Test Location: Tennessee, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
11.8% improvement on a Dodge Mini Van engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
7.0% average improvement on 4 Ford Truck engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
17.4% improvement on a Dodge Mini Van engine via CO2 testing
12.4% average improvement on 4 Ford Truck engines via CO2 testing
6.7% improvement on a Dodge Mini Van engine via HC testing
29.6% average improvement on 4 Ford Truck engines via HC testing

Result 49 of 76

Test Id: 108
Title: Neff Trucking
File Size: 12.954 MB
Industries: Trucking
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 7-Jun-1987
Test Date: 1-Jul-1987
Test Location: Ohio, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
6.0% average improvement on 2 Cummins 300 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
6.0% average improvement on 2 Detroit 466 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
6.0% average improvement on 2 Mack 237 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
6.0% average improvement on 4 Mack 300 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
10.8% average improvement on 2 Cummins 300 engines via CO2 testing
10.8% average improvement on 2 Detroit 466 engines via CO2 testing
10.8% average improvement on 2 Mack 237 engines via CO2 testing
10.8% average improvement on 4 Mack 300 engines via CO2 testing

Result 50 of 76

Test Id: 64
Title: North Flinders
File Size: 0.165 MB
Industries: Generators, Mining
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 1-Aug-1989
Test Date: 6-May-1989
Test Location: Southern Australia, Australia
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
2.8% improvement on a Man V16 20/27 engine via Specific Fuel Consumption testing
Engine Emissions Results:
0.0% improvement on a Man V16 20/27 engine via CO testing
3.7% improvement on a Man V16 20/27 engine via CO2 testing
54.5% improvement on a Man V16 20/27 engine via HC testing
33.0% improvement on a Man V16 20/27 engine via Smoke Spot testing

Result 51 of 76

Test Id: 53
Title: Occidental Chemical
File Size: 0.038 MB
Industries: Mining
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: Not Given in Report
Test Date: Not Given in Report
Test Location: Florida, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
13.4% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3306 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
4.5% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3408 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
7.5% average improvement on 2 Perkins In-Line 6 1006-6 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
18.0% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3306 engines via CO testing
9.1% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3408 engines via CO testing
14.8% improvement on a Perkins In-Line 6 1006-6 engine via CO testing
10.0% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3306 engines via CO2 testing
0.1% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3408 engines via CO2 testing
-4.5% improvement on a Perkins In-Line 6 1006-6 engine via CO2 testing
-6.6% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3306 engines via HC testing
-19.8% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3408 engines via HC testing
-68.4% improvement on a Perkins In-Line 6 1006-6 engine via HC testing

Result 52 of 76

Test Id: 157
Title: Peak Downs mine
File Size: 7.699 MB
Industries: Mining
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 1-Mar-1991
Test Date: 28-Aug-1990
Test Location: Queensland Australia, Australia
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
13.0% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTTA 38 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
12.9% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTTA 38 engines via CO testing
21.2% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTTA 38 engines via CO2 testing
43.1% average improvement on 2 Cummins KTTA 38 engines via HC testing
33.9% average improvement on 3 Cummins KTTA 38 engines via Smoke Spot testing

Result 53 of 76

Test Id: 133
Title: Perugia Italy
File Size: 0.029 MB
Industries: Generators
Report Type: Laboratory Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: Not Given in Report
Test Date: Not Given in Report
Test Location: Perugia, Italy
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
2.6% average improvement on 2 Genset 4-cylinder engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing
4.3% average improvement on 3 Genset 4-cylinder engines via Statistical testing
Engine Emissions Results:
21.8% average improvement on 2 Genset 4-cylinder engines via CO testing
0.2% average improvement on 2 Genset 4-cylinder engines via CO2 testing

Result 54 of 76

Test Id: 110
Title: Pierce Trucking
File Size: 5.133 MB
Industries: Trucking
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 9-Nov-1987
Test Date: 1-Oct-1987
Test Location: Pennsylvania, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
8.5% average improvement on 2 Cummins 300 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
8.5% average improvement on 6 Cummins 350 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
8.5% average improvement on 2 Cummins 400 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
8.5% average improvement on 2 Detroit 435 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
15.1% average improvement on 2 Cummins 300 engines via CO2 testing
15.1% average improvement on 6 Cummins 350 engines via CO2 testing
15.1% average improvement on 2 Cummins 400 engines via CO2 testing
15.1% average improvement on 2 Detroit 435 engines via CO2 testing

Result 55 of 76

Test Id: 26
Title: Provo City
File Size: 51.613 MB
Industries: Trucking
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel), Gasoline
Report Date: 12-Sep-1995
Test Date: 12-Jun-1995
Test Location: Utah, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
6.8% average improvement on 4 Caterpillar 3208T engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
8.3% average improvement on 2 Cummins L-10 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
9.0% average improvement on 5 Ford 5.0L engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
10.6% improvement on a Int'l 466DT engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
12.6% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3208 engines via CO testing
8.2% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3208T engines via CO testing
-19.0% average improvement on 2 Cummins L-10 engines via CO testing
15.5% average improvement on 6 Ford 5.0L engines via CO testing
22.4% improvement on a Int'l 466DT engine via CO testing
3.4% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3208 engines via CO2 testing
3.8% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3208T engines via CO2 testing
9.3% average improvement on 2 Cummins L-10 engines via CO2 testing
9.3% average improvement on 6 Ford 5.0L engines via CO2 testing
9.5% improvement on a Int'l 466DT engine via CO2 testing
32.3% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3208 engines via HC testing
37.5% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3208T engines via HC testing
8.1% average improvement on 2 Cummins L-10 engines via HC testing
5.2% average improvement on 4 Ford 5.0L engines via HC testing
33.6% improvement on a Int'l 466DT engine via HC testing
21.3% average improvement on 4 Caterpillar 3208T engines via Smoke Spot testing
22.0% average improvement on 2 Cummins L-10 engines via Smoke Spot testing
0.0% improvement on a Int'l 466DT engine via Smoke Spot testing

Result 56 of 76

Test Id: 65
Title: RedBank Power
File Size: 0.228 MB
Industries: Generators
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels:
Report Date: 1-Nov-1983
Test Date: 12-Oct-1983
Test Location: New South Wales, Australia
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
3.9% average improvement on 2 Man 18V 52/55A engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
26.0% average improvement on 2 Man 18V 52/55A engines via CO testing
4.0% average improvement on 2 Man 18V 52/55A engines via CO2 testing
100.0% average improvement on 2 Man 18V 52/55A engines via HC testing

Result 57 of 76

Test Id: 136
Title: Rio Tinto UWA Thesis
File Size: 3.684 MB
Industries: Generators, Mining
Report Type: Laboratory Test
Benefits: Carbon in engine, Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 24-Nov-2005
Test Date: Not Given in Report
Test Location: Western Australia, Australia
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
1.3% average improvement on 3 Perkins 4 cylinder 1000 engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing
2.8% average improvement on 3 Perkins 6 cylinder 1000 engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing
Engine Emissions Results:
-8.6% improvement on a Perkins 4 cylinder 1000 engine via CO testing
-6.3% improvement on a Perkins 6 cylinder 1000 engine via CO testing
7.4% improvement on a Perkins 4 cylinder 1000 engine via CO2 testing
0.4% improvement on a Perkins 6 cylinder 1000 engine via CO2 testing
-9.4% improvement on a Perkins 4 cylinder 1000 engine via HC testing
5.3% improvement on a Perkins 6 cylinder 1000 engine via HC testing
8.7% improvement on a Perkins 4 cylinder 1000 engine via NOx testing
9.0% improvement on a Perkins 6 cylinder 1000 engine via NOx testing

Result 58 of 76

Test Id: 222
Title: Royal Caribbean
File Size: 4.725 MB
Industries: Marine
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 4D Diesel (Bunker C, Heavy Fuel Oil, 380 centistoke)
Report Date: 14-May-2012
Test Date: 8-Apr-2012
Test Location: Florida, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
4.5% improvement on a Wartsila 6X12V46C engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
2.4% average improvement on 4 Wartsila 6X12V46C engines via Specific Fuel Consumption testing
Engine Emissions Results:
16.0% improvement on a Wartsila 6X12V46C engine via CO testing
4.2% improvement on a Wartsila 6X12V46C engine via CO2 testing
20.4% improvement on a Wartsila 6X12V46C engine via HC testing
38.8% average improvement on 4 Wartsila 6X12V46C engines via Smoke Spot testing

Result 59 of 76

Test Id: 58
Title: San Juan Coal
File Size: 3.470 MB
Industries: Mining
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 1-Jan-1985
Test Date: 1-Aug-1984
Test Location: New Mexico, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
7.6% improvement on a Caterpillar 3406 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
4.3% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3408 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
10.5% improvement on a Caterpillar 3412 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
11.6% improvement on a Caterpillar 353 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
5.6% improvement on a Cummins 2300TKD engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
2.7% average improvement on 3 Cummins VT-1710 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
93.3% improvement on a Cummins VT-1710 engine via CO testing
13.2% improvement on a Cummins VT-1710 engine via CO2 testing
98.0% improvement on a Cummins VT-1710 engine via HC testing

Result 60 of 76

Test Id: 47
Title: Smoky Canyon Mine
File Size: 7.162 MB
Industries: Mining
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 2-Sep-1993
Test Date: Not Given in Report
Test Location: Wyoming, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
5.6% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3406 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
10.9% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3512 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
8.3% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3406 engines via CO testing
0.0% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3512 engines via CO testing
4.8% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3406 engines via CO2 testing
9.9% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3512 engines via CO2 testing
22.9% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3406 engines via HC testing
16.3% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3512 engines via HC testing
24.7% average improvement on 2 Caterpillar 3406 engines via Smoke Spot testing
7.7% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3512 engines via Smoke Spot testing

Result 61 of 76

Test Id: 112
Title: T.G. Lee Foods, Inc
File Size: 13.442 MB
Industries: Trucking
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 30-Oct-1995
Test Date: 25-Oct-1995
Test Location: Florida, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
7.7% average improvement on 4 Caterpillar 3406-B engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
4.6% average improvement on 4 Caterpillar 3406-B engines via CO testing
8.4% average improvement on 4 Caterpillar 3406-B engines via CO2 testing
6.3% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3406-B engines via HC testing
16.2% improvement on a Caterpillar 3408B engine via HC testing
8.5% average improvement on 4 Caterpillar 3406-B engines via Smoke Spot testing

Result 62 of 76

Test Id: 2
Title: Three Rivers Aluminum Co (Traco)
File Size: 7.716 MB
Industries: Trucking
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 21-Sep-1988
Test Date: 7-Jul-1988
Test Location: Pennsylvania, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
8.2% average improvement on 6 Cummins 315 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
-11.4% average improvement on 6 Cummins 315 engines via CO testing
8.3% average improvement on 6 Cummins 315 engines via CO2 testing
31.5% average improvement on 6 Cummins 315 engines via HC testing

Result 63 of 76

Test Id: 113
Title: Three Rivers Ice Cream
File Size: 6.057 MB
Industries: Trucking
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 20-Aug-1988
Test Date: 25-May-1988
Test Location: Pennsylvania, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
7.3% average improvement on 4 International Harvester engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
4.7% average improvement on 2 Mack 237 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
0.8% average improvement on 4 International Harvester engines via CO testing
4.5% average improvement on 2 Mack 237 engines via CO testing
13.2% average improvement on 4 International Harvester engines via CO2 testing
10.3% average improvement on 2 Mack 237 engines via CO2 testing
22.6% average improvement on 4 International Harvester engines via HC testing
14.2% average improvement on 2 Mack 237 engines via HC testing

Result 64 of 76

Test Id: 16
Title: Tidewater Marine
File Size: 19.169 MB
Industries: Marine
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 17-Aug-1982
Test Date: 23-Jul-1982
Test Location: Louisiana, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
44.8% average improvement on 16 Detroit V871 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
50.3% average improvement on 16 Detroit V871 engines via CO2 testing
38.0% average improvement on 16 Detroit V871 engines via HC testing
Notes: The extraordinary improvement numbers found in this test report are primarily due to the extreme carbon build up in the Brahma's engine. FPC was able to clean the engine resulting in improvement numbers that are much larger than the norm. Per the observations section of the report, the gas analyzer's filters were plugged during the baseline testing: this implies that the percent improvement for the Brahma may actually be larger than the numbers reported.

Result 65 of 76

Test Id: 139
Title: Tri-County Transit
File Size: 9.575 MB
Industries: Buses
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 20-Feb-1991
Test Date: 8-Aug-1990
Test Location: Florida, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
2.1% improvement on a Detroit 6V92 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
70.0% improvement on a Detroit 6V92 engine via CO testing
1.4% improvement on a Detroit 6V92 engine via CO2 testing
22.5% improvement on a Detroit 6V92 engine via HC testing

Result 66 of 76

Test Id: 30
Title: Triangle Gas Company
File Size: 26.224 MB
Industries: Trucking
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 28-May-1987
Test Date: 17-Apr-1987
Test Location: Pennsylvania, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
7.2% average improvement on 4 Cummins 350 Turbo engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
7.2% average improvement on 4 Cummins 400 Turbo engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
7.2% average improvement on 6 Detroit 430 Turbo engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
7.2% average improvement on 2 Mack 673T engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
12.0% average improvement on 4 Cummins 350 Turbo engines via CO2 testing
12.0% average improvement on 4 Cummins 400 Turbo engines via CO2 testing
12.0% average improvement on 6 Detroit 430 Turbo engines via CO2 testing
12.0% average improvement on 2 Mack 673T engines via CO2 testing

Result 67 of 76

Test Id: 76
Title: US Steel
File Size: 8.190 MB
Industries: Railroad
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 10-Oct-1988
Test Date: 30-Aug-1988
Test Location: Pennsylvania, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
7.0% average improvement on 2 EMD SW1200 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
6.4% average improvement on 2 EMD SW1200 engines via CO2 testing
41.4% average improvement on 2 EMD SW1200 engines via HC testing

Result 68 of 76

Test Id: 21
Title: Utah Power and Light for PacifiCorp
File Size: 39.809 MB
Industries: Mining, Trucking
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 29-Apr-1992
Test Date: 21-Jun-1991
Test Location: Utah, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
4.2% average improvement on 4 Caterpillar 777B engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
1.1% average improvement on 4 Caterpillar 777B engines via CO testing
0.6% average improvement on 4 Caterpillar 777B engines via CO2 testing
-10.5% average improvement on 4 Caterpillar 777B engines via HC testing

Result 69 of 76

Test Id: 9
Title: Utah Power and Light Scenic
File Size: 6.994 MB
Industries: Generators, Mining
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel), Gasoline
Report Date: 27-Jul-1993
Test Date: Not Given in Report
Test Location: Utah, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
6.9% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3208 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
7.8% improvement on a Detroit 8.2 engine via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
29.4% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3208 engines via CO testing
15.4% improvement on a Detroit 8.2 engine via CO testing
5.7% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3208 engines via CO2 testing
6.5% improvement on a Detroit 8.2 engine via CO2 testing
15.7% average improvement on 3 Caterpillar 3208 engines via HC testing
-52.7% improvement on a Detroit 8.2 engine via HC testing

Result 70 of 76

Test Id: 115
Title: Vogel Disposal
File Size: 10.107 MB
Industries: Trucking
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 9-Dec-1987
Test Date: 28-Nov-1987
Test Location: Pennsylvania, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
5.2% average improvement on 2 Mack 300 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
0.0% average improvement on 2 Mack 300 engines via CO testing
3.5% average improvement on 2 Mack 300 engines via CO2 testing

Result 71 of 76

Test Id: 117
Title: Wal-Mart
File Size: 34.933 MB
Industries: Trucking
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 6-Mar-1995
Test Date: 1-Mar-1995
Test Location: Arkansas, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
6.9% average improvement on 5 Detroit S-60 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
-42.2% average improvement on 3 Detroit S-60 engines via CO testing
11.9% average improvement on 5 Detroit S-60 engines via CO2 testing
-2.4% average improvement on 4 Detroit S-60 engines via HC testing

Result 72 of 76

Test Id: 118
Title: Waste Management of Dallas
File Size: 36.117 MB
Industries: Trucking
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 28-Jun-1995
Test Date: 25-Apr-1995
Test Location: Texas, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
8.0% average improvement on 7 Mack 300 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
11.5% average improvement on 7 Mack 300 engines via CO testing
3.2% average improvement on 7 Mack 300 engines via CO2 testing
0.8% average improvement on 7 Mack 300 engines via HC testing
22.4% average improvement on 7 Mack 300 engines via Smoke Spot testing

Result 73 of 76

Test Id: 119
Title: Wayne W. Sell Corporation
File Size: 10.465 MB
Industries: Trucking
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 1-Dec-1987
Test Date: 19-Nov-1987
Test Location: Pennsylvania, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
5.3% average improvement on 4 Cummins 350 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
5.3% average improvement on 2 Mack 285 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
5.3% average improvement on 2 Mack 300 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
5.3% average improvement on 2 Mack 350 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
1.0% average improvement on 4 Cummins 350 engines via CO testing
1.0% average improvement on 2 Mack 285 engines via CO testing
1.0% average improvement on 2 Mack 300 engines via CO testing
1.0% average improvement on 2 Mack 350 engines via CO testing
5.1% average improvement on 4 Cummins 350 engines via CO2 testing
5.1% average improvement on 2 Mack 285 engines via CO2 testing
5.1% average improvement on 2 Mack 300 engines via CO2 testing
5.1% average improvement on 2 Mack 350 engines via CO2 testing

Result 74 of 76

Test Id: 15
Title: Wepher Marine
File Size: 6.407 MB
Industries: Marine
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 16-Sep-1993
Test Date: Not Given in Report
Test Location: Tennessee, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
6.0% average improvement on 2 Detroit 16V92 engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
21.4% improvement on a Detroit 16V92 engine via CO testing
5.4% average improvement on 2 Detroit 16V92 engines via CO2 testing
29.1% improvement on a Detroit 16V92 engine via HC testing
8.3% average improvement on 2 Detroit 16V92 engines via Smoke Spot testing

Result 75 of 76

Test Id: 19
Title: Willamette & Pacific
File Size: 46.817 MB
Industries: Railroad
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 1-Mar-1995
Test Date: 1-Feb-1995
Test Location: Oregon, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
5.6% average improvement on 14 EMD 645E engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
-22.1% average improvement on 12 EMD 645E engines via CO testing
3.7% average improvement on 14 EMD 645E engines via CO2 testing
1.5% average improvement on 14 EMD 645E engines via HC testing
18.6% average improvement on 12 EMD 645E engines via Smoke Spot testing

Result 76 of 76

Test Id: 3
Title: Wisconsin Central
File Size: 53.768 MB
Industries: Railroad
Report Type: Field Test
Benefits: Emissions, Fuel economy, Maintenance/engine wear, Wayside fires
Fuels: 2D Diesel (Regular Diesel)
Report Date: 19-Aug-1996
Test Date: 14-Aug-1996
Test Location: Wisconsin, USA
Summary: Fuel Economy Results:
5.9% average improvement on 5 EMD GP35 16 Cylinder engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
7.6% average improvement on 5 EMD SW1500 12 Cylinder engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
5.5% average improvement on 2 EMD SW1500 16 Cylinder engines via Carbon Mass Balance testing
Engine Emissions Results:
4.9% average improvement on 8 EMD GP35 16 Cylinder engines via CO testing
12.9% average improvement on 5 EMD SW1500 12 Cylinder engines via CO testing
1.5% average improvement on 2 EMD SW1500 16 Cylinder engines via CO testing
5.2% average improvement on 8 EMD GP35 16 Cylinder engines via CO2 testing
8.4% average improvement on 5 EMD SW1500 12 Cylinder engines via CO2 testing
6.5% improvement on a EMD SW1500 16 Cylinder engine via CO2 testing
-18.5% average improvement on 7 EMD GP35 16 Cylinder engines via HC testing
10.2% average improvement on 5 EMD SW1500 12 Cylinder engines via HC testing
17.8% average improvement on 10 EMD GP35 16 Cylinder engines via Smoke Spot testing
27.5% average improvement on 4 EMD SW1500 12 Cylinder engines via Smoke Spot testing
22.0% average improvement on 4 EMD SW1500 16 Cylinder engines via Smoke Spot testing